Phabricator has a tokens feature, but it's very unclear what the purpose of it is. It may make sense to disable the tokens feature.
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Declined | Qgil | T899 Unclear what the point of tokens in Phabricator is | |||
| Declined | None | T138 Define an equivalent to Gerrit's +-1 +-2 for code review evaluation |
Event Timeline
There are a very large number of changes, so older changes are hidden. Show Older Changes
Comment Actions
... which can be "discovered" by editing one's personal sidebar and adding "Tokens":
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/home/
Comment Actions
@MZMcBride would like to take all the fun and feeling out of our work. boo!
I really wish we could award tokens to people.
Comment Actions
I think it's like Wikilove and useful. I'd be interested if it's possible to add/upload _new_ award tokens. it would be more fun if we cold have _actual barnstars_ and things that are specific to Wikimedia.
Comment Actions
Tokens are usually taken as a sign or appreciation or a form of a +1 but I have seen, through the use of the thumbs down token, that it can also be used as a -1 or a disproval act (as can be seen in this and the token). I'm a bit divided over this use of tokens. Its a bit counter intuitive and doesn't show the disproval very well. Its awarding a token and then it shows up on the user's page which then could show that this user has closed this many "bad" or controversial issues.
Comment Actions
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/token/leaders/ can show a list of popular, or perhaps unpopular tasks. Only slightly amused by the fact that this task is the current leader.
Comment Actions
I don't know why a task saying that the point of tokens on Phabricator is unclear would get so many tokens.
recursion
Comment Actions
I think it would help if we only had a subset that had at least a loosely documented meaning at mw:Phabricator/Tokens , where I have added links and meanings for some of them.
Some of the tokens have a mostly well established meaning, such as Like and Dislike. The currency tokens also borrow from symbols that are commonly understood.
However the majority of them have no clear meaning, even in English, so if some groups are currently using them for specific meanings they are effectively having a private conversation in public, and we should be rejecting exclusionary communication methods.
And of course the situation is much worse for ESL. e.g. even with the currency tokens, the first three would be more inclusive if the hover-overs for the first three mentioned "bronze", "silver" and "gold", as those 'value' meaning are mostly universal understood. "Haypence" is especially confusing, as Heypence is plural, while the icon only has a single coin. The most common actual haypence was the three-halfpeny, a single silver coin. I've created redirects on English Wikipedia to try to guide people to the most suitable article about the bronze coin, whereas previously it was directing readers to the silver three-haypenny.
Comment Actions
Since a few months I explain the meaning of my tokens at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Ricordisamoa/
Comment Actions
As tokens are per task and not per a specific comment, I'm unsure whether a token added at a certain point in time refers to a recently added previous comment, or really to the task itself.
Given that there is no shared interpretation of what a specific token means, I consider tokens pretty often noise (or "fun", depending on your point of view).
(Furthermore, I would not interpret an added thumbs-down token as "appreciation". ;) )
Tokens *could* be useful to avoid noisy "me too"/"+1"/"meh" comments which would not add technical value - if tokens were per comment and not per task, plus had a clearer/shared meaning. IMHO, GitLab manages slightly better by having two default tokens (thumbs-up/thumbs-down), a questionable "way more random emoji tokens" dropdown button, and tokens per comment/task description but not per task:
