New project information:

• Name: Planet
• Additional hashtags: none, #planet will be natural and enough
• Description: Planet Wikimedia is a weblog aggregator operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, to bring together on-topic posts about wikis from Wikimedia community members.
• Type of project: Project
• Policy: default

Hi, is there community consensus for this?

Not yet, I've in written in parallel this bug and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Planet_Wikimedia.

fwiw, the trigger to make ops merge stuff is adding people (me) on Gerrit, i regularly check my review queue there and claim to always merge those planet changes quickly, as long as they show up in my gerrit queue. it's true that i wouldn't check the meta page itself. so i'm all for this. it should have been Bugzilla now it should be phab.

i think if you got Dereckson and Nemo and I you got "community consensus" achieved :)

I suggest WONTFIX. The Meta-Wiki request page is the place where consensus can be verified, and it must be on wiki. The "true" queue of requests is on gerrit and is usually enough for most cases as the blog authors generally have a gerrit account which can be cc'd.

This very report is in the wrong place, because you should have first achieved consensus on talk page.

In T1323#23211, @Dereckson wrote:

• Name: Planet

How will that allow differentiating aggregation requests from technical issues with Planet (e.g. that blogpost exposes wrong character encodings, the planet is down etc) if that is wanted?
We will have a "Wikimedia-Planet" project in Phab after importing the "Wikimedia > Planet" product>component from Bugzilla.