After T186320 is closed, we should have a master and a proper master candidate for failover with STATEMENT based replication, not replicating ROW to sanitarium, and physically separated from the original master. T186320 is only a soft blocker, some work could be done already.
- s1
- master: db1052
- candidate: db1067
- s2
- master: db1054
- candidate: db1076
- s3
- master: db1075
- candidate: db1078
- s4
- master: db1068
- candidate: db1081
- s5
- master: db1070
- candidate: db1100
- s6
- master: db1061
- candidate: db1093
- s7
- master: db1062
- candidate: db1069 (only pending its movement to another row - T186699)
- s8
- master: db1071
- candidate: db1104
- x1
- master: db1055
- candidate: db1056 (we always use ROW for non-s* hosts, although it would be nice to move it to another row)