Maniphest T20134

Distinguish "ok" revision status between "looks ok" and "I've tested it and it works"
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Assigned To

Authored By

	• brion
	Mar 24 2009, 7:36 PM

Description

Sometimes a code change *looks* ok but has side effects or problems which become evident after actually trying it. It would be nice to have a little more confidence of whether something has been thoroughly poked or not.

Maybe another status level beyond "ok", or maybe a separate flag that indicates someone's actually tried it.

Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement

Details

Reference: bz18134

Event Timeline

• bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 21 2014, 10:35 PM

• bzimport added a project: MediaWiki-extensions-CodeReview.

• bzimport set Reference to bz18134.

• brion created this task.Mar 24 2009, 7:36 PM

What should it be called? "good"?

"tested" maybe... though should make sure that doesn't conflict with integration of data from automatic running of regression tests.

"verified" it is :)

Done in r48833

ayg wrote:

(that should be r48934, I guess)

Distinguish "ok" revision status between "looks ok" and "I've tested it and it works"Closed, ResolvedPublicActions

Description

Details

Event Timeline

Distinguish "ok" revision status between "looks ok" and "I've tested it and it works"
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions