Discussing on https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuaria_discusi%C3%B3n:XanaG#Filtro_111, it was mentioned that there are certain cases where there is an AbuseFilter that should have avoided an edit to be saved, yet it went through.
Specifically, the last case we spotted was this version of filter 111 not blocking this edit.
The user did not gain autoconfirmed nor any other normal group that could have been later removed.
Using /test shows that the filter does trigger on that edit (i.e. the filter was written correctly). That version was active at the time (I checked it when that was the only filter version, even). The filter was enabled, with the only action of "Prevent the user from performing the action in question".
However, the edit clearly went through, and there is no AbuseLog either.
So, we have an edit that should have been blocked directly by the AbuseFilter (it doesn't even involve throttling) yet it didn't for unknown reasons. This isn't the first time that such weirdness is spotted.
Note: this is a different bug than T62481 (and T240951).