No objections.

Uhm, forgot one thing. As this is a special wiki, I request that bureaucrats be able to add and remove all user rights except steward, checkuser and oversight. Those rights will be added trough meta if needed.

Thanks.

Update: please enable subpages in all name spaces too. Thank you.

pdhanda wrote:

They should all be done now. Let me know if I missed something.

(In reply to comment #4)

They should all be done now. Let me know if I missed something.

Nope :) Userrights stuff is pending. Bureaucrats in stewardwiki are suposed to be able to add and remove all userrights from all accounts including themselves. Thanks.

Ruslik00 wrote:

Actually in

'+stewardwiki' => array(

'bureaucrat' => array( 'accountcreator', 'import', 'transwiki', 'user', 'autoconfirmed', 'ipblock-exempt' ),
)

'
'autoconfirmed' should be removed (all auto-confirmed userrights are now in the 'user' group).

'accountcreator' is also not very userful.

Also the following should be added to 'wgRemoveGroups' => array(

'+stewardwiki' => array(

'bureaucrat' => array( 'bureaucrat', 'sysop', 'import', 'transwiki', 'user',  'ipblock-exempt' ),
)

Done

(In reply to comment #6)

Actually in

'+stewardwiki' => array(

'bureaucrat' => array( 'accountcreator', 'import', 'transwiki', 'user',

'autoconfirmed', 'ipblock-exempt' ),

)

'
'autoconfirmed' should be removed (all auto-confirmed userrights are now in the
'user' group).

'accountcreator' is also not very userful.

Also the following should be added to 'wgRemoveGroups' => array(

'+stewardwiki' => array(

'bureaucrat' => array( 'bureaucrat', 'sysop', 'import', 'transwiki',

'user', 'ipblock-exempt' ),

)

Sorry to reopen.

Actually easier if we simply add to the bureaucrat group the 'userrights' permission (as the steward group has). We already have that permissions at meta and this is our private wiki so no controversy here I think. Please fix that. The point is to be able to do as much stuff locally there as we can.

Please also create a "Case" and "Archive" (with its respective talk pages) namespaces. Might be useful.

Regards.

bugs wrote:

(In reply to comment #8)

Actually easier if we simply add to the bureaucrat group the 'userrights'
permission (as the steward group has). We already have that permissions at meta
and this is our private wiki so no controversy here I think. Please fix that.
The point is to be able to do as much stuff locally there as we can.

I'm not necessarily against this, but there's more to it than just "we already have rights on Meta": transparency. On Meta-Wiki, all of the changes are publicly logged and people are held accountable. If userrights was given on a private wiki, a steward could make changes to userrights across Wikimedia and no one else would know what was changed.

(In reply to comment #9)

I'm not necessarily against this, but there's more to it than just "we already
have rights on Meta": transparency. On Meta-Wiki, all of the changes are
publicly logged and people are held accountable. If userrights was given on a
private wiki, a steward could make changes to userrights across Wikimedia and
no one else would know what was changed.

No. You are referring to 'userrights-interwiki' which is a different permission and obviously not requested here.

bugs wrote:

(In reply to comment #10)

No. You are referring to 'userrights-interwiki' which is a different permission
and obviously not requested here.

Aha, you're right. Ignore me. :-)

pdhanda wrote:

Added userrights for bureaucrats and added the namespaces.