@Samwalton9-WMF Is this required for all wikis, or the largest N number of wikis or a specific set of wikis?

In T373106#10106910, @KCVelaga_WMF wrote:

@Samwalton9-WMF Is this required for all wikis, or the largest N number of wikis or a specific set of wikis?

I think we can probably start with the list we published here, but also including Serbian, Latvian, and Punjabi Wikipedias, as they've all expressed some interest since the original data was published.

@Samwalton9-WMF I did an initial aggregation here. Depending on what we get from the testing process, we can adjust the thresholds and re-calculate.

Thank you! We'll revisit this data to put on our new testing page once we've figured out the rough initial thresholds.

In T373106#10161256, @KCVelaga_WMF wrote:

@Samwalton9-WMF I did an initial aggregation here. Depending on what we get from the testing process, we can adjust the thresholds and re-calculate.

Could you re-run these for 0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99?

Could you re-run these for 0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.99?

In the same notebook, I added 0.96 to the overall table and also a table at the end with just the given thresholds, and a CSV file of the same.