Incorrect revision dates on some revisions in various Wikimedia Foundation wikis
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Assigned To
None
Priority
Low
Author
bzimport
Blocks
T18660: Database table cleanup (tracking)
Commits
Unknown Object (Diffusion Commit)
Subscribers
Nemo_bis, Graham87, MZMcBride, wikibugs-l
Projects
Reference
bz2219
Description

Author: sr.ribeiro

Description:
Has reported at

http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Esplanada/geral&oldid=357294#Bugs

On the diff of the URL (
http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&diff=prev&oldid=246324 ), some of
the info on the right --
Revisão de 00:16, 4 Jan 2003
Lucpilla (Discussão | contribs)
revertido para a última de Daniel Hoisel
Ver a alteração posterior →

  • is wrong, according to user Lucpilla, this is not the correct date of her

first contribution, but yes, this one ->
http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Som&diff=prev&oldid=233746

The correct date on the edition on the article Wiki, should be 10 Mar 2005. Note
also that this edition does not appear on the history of the Wiki article (
http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&action=history ).


Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
URL: http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&diff=prev&oldid=246324

bzimport added a subscriber: wikibugs-l.
bzimport set Reference to bz2219.
bzimport created this task.Via LegacyMay 22 2005, 2:26 AM
bzimport added a comment.Via ConduitOct 13 2005, 10:51 AM

gangleri wrote:

(In reply to comment #0)

The correct date on the edition on the article Wiki, should be 10 Mar 2005. Note
also that this edition does not appear on the history of the Wiki article (
http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&action=history ).

This makes sense; compare with:
http://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wiki&limit=500&action=history

brion added a comment.Via ConduitApr 25 2007, 7:15 PM
  • Bug 9629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Graham87 added a comment.Via ConduitFeb 5 2010, 4:06 PM
Nemo_bis added a comment.Via ConduitAug 23 2012, 7:10 PM

Is bug 4744 (which I've stumbled upon twice in two days) the same?

Graham87 added a comment.Via ConduitAug 24 2012, 12:28 AM
  • Bug 4744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Graham87 added a comment.Via ConduitAug 24 2012, 12:32 AM

Yes, marked as such.

Aklapper added a comment.Via ConduitNov 10 2012, 3:45 PM

See bug 2930 and its duplicates.

  • This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2930 ***
epriestley added a commit: Unknown Object (Diffusion Commit).Via DaemonsMar 4 2015, 8:15 AM

Add Comment