Page MenuHomePhabricator

50GB Fractal image Upload
Closed, DeclinedPublic

Description

Author: ev_said

Description:
Good Day

I'm working on a 50GB image of generated Fractals (250,000 x 76,000 pixels)
which I wish to upload and link it to the "Fractals" page of wikipedia as
a demonstration of Fractals diversity and capabilities.

I would appreciate any recommendations on how to upload it, how the browser
would show it ... etc.

Thank you
E. Victor


Version: unspecified
Severity: enhancement

Details

Reference
bz69180

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 22 2014, 3:39 AM
bzimport set Reference to bz69180.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).
  • Bug 69181 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

could you clarify what the file format is?

what is the size in SVG if 50GB is not SVG?

any examples of other websites or applications that display similar scale fractals? so we can see how their UI/implementation works.

thanks

ev_said wrote:

File would be *.png format (a raster image)

Example of a gigapixal fractal (though only BW,
my design will be full colour)

http://gigapan.com/gigapans?tags=fractal

ev_said wrote:

File would be *.png format (a raster image)

Example of a gigapixal fractal(though only BW,
my design will be full colour)

http://gigapan.com/gigapans?tags=fractal

thank you

As a quick response, there is no way that the servers could scale this image.

No one will be able to download it either, it'll just take an age...

At that point, uploading a 50GB image really isn't going to happen, there's just no point

ev_said wrote:

Ok, what's the max dimensions/size you could handle,
so i'll try to upload a reduced version ?

thanks

ev_said wrote:

Ok, what's the max dimensions/size you could handle,
so i'll try to upload a reduced version ?

thanks

(In reply to ev_said from comment #8)

Ok, what's the max dimensions/size you could handle,
so i'll try to upload a reduced version ?

thanks

1 GB is the limit from upload wizard. Given your usecase, I think we should stick to that limit as the max.

ev_said wrote:

Noted :-)
Thanks a lot

[Closed as RESOLVED WONTFIX: an alternative solution has been offered]