First, create a lua template that can generate that team's table. Then create a variant that can create the megamatrix (all teams within one quarter).
Description
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | • ksmith | T108215 [EPIC] Review, synthesize, and present Q4 THC data | |||
Resolved | • KLans_WMF | T108090 Generate Health Check tables using Lua |
Event Timeline
@ggellerman and @KLans_WMF will validate the data in all 4 megamatrices, plus also the team table on each of the team-specific pages. For the latter, some footnotes will be required before the old team tables can be deleted.
@KLans_WMF and I reviewed lua megamatrix against published results & spreadsheet results
@KLans_WMF will get back to @ksmith with notes & comments
@ksmith everything checked out with the exception of RelEng Q4 result, both on the individual team page and the megamatrix:
https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Health_check_survey_results/RelEng
https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Health_check_survey_results/Test_lua_tables
I believe the reason was a cell error on the Q4 spreadsheet. It looks like it cause your script to run through the previous (Q3) quarter's results and generate those for Q4. I have fixed the cell error, so hopefully it's a simple matter to rerun.
Manual review for the win!
The remaining work on this is to add footnotes to the individual tables.
The footnotes are:
- addition of cross-team communication in fr-tech q2
- blank Releng q2 process
- additional categories in q2 research
- addition of reputation in web q3
- score of 3.5 in Q4 Flow/Collab (leave blank and add footnote)
- not reported value for research q3 comm involvement
It looks like I inadvertently copied all the Q3 data into the actual Q4 RelEng data page[1]. I just manually entered the Q4 data directly from the official RelEng rating spreadsheet into that page, so it should be fixed.
[1] https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/Health_check_survey_results/RelEng/2014-15_Q4
Looks good to me @ksmith!
I'll make a separate ticket for footnotes, and I think we can call this closed :-) Thanks for all the hard work.