[11:17:07] <legoktm> did something change in the parser in wmf.12?
[11:17:17] <legoktm> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/apps now displays <noinclude> tags
[11:17:46] <legoktm> https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Template:plural_of&action=edit has an unclosed <noinclude> tag, but it definitely used to work
[11:19:12] <Krenair> yeah that changed
[11:19:23] <Krenair> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/255258/
[11:19:47] <Krenair> wmf.12 change
[11:21:42] <legoktm> MatmaRex: ^^
[11:22:10] <legoktm> > * Should we keep previous behavior for unclosed <includeonly> / <noinclude>? This would be particularly disruptive for these if someone relied on the old behavior, and they're already special-cased in places.
[11:22:15] <legoktm> yeah.... :P
[11:22:28] <MatmaRex> hm
[11:22:36] <MatmaRex> yes
[11:22:42] <MatmaRex> how bad is it? :P
[11:23:25] <greg-g> wmf.12 is on group0 and group1, fwiw
[11:24:59] <legoktm> MatmaRex: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Grease_pit#Project_link_template_mess
[11:25:18] <legoktm> it's also breaking templates on commons apparently
[11:26:22] <Krenair> can you put together a quick fix to backport, or should this change be reverted out of wmf.12?
[11:28:06] <MatmaRex> uhh, i probably can
[11:28:32] <legoktm> should I file a bug about this?
[11:28:39] <MatmaRex> but do we want to do it this way? if it's breaking too many things, go ahead and revert
[11:29:40] <Krenair> legoktm, yes, I think so
[11:30:03] <MatmaRex> barack obama, for one, looks fine. so it might be just a few broken templates.
[11:30:18] <MatmaRex> commons' main page seems rekt, but i probably don't have permissions to fix it…