Page MenuHomePhabricator
Create Task
Maniphest T129766

Enable Reviewer, autoreviewer and rollback rights in Kazakh Wikipedia
Closed, ResolvedPublic
Actions

Description

Please enable Reviewer, autoreviewer and rollback user rights in the Kazakh Wikipedia (kk.wikipedia.org) like in Russian Wikipedia per discussion: https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%8F:%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%85%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8B%D2%9B#.D0.9F.D0.B0.D1.82.D1.80.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.2F_Reviewing

  1. All sysops must automatically have Reviewer and autoreviewer rights (there edits to reviewed pages must be marked as "reviewed automatically").
  2. Reviewing must be enabled like in Russian Wikipedia.

If you have further questions, feel free to ask.

Update 2016-03-18: The rollback part has been deployed.

Related Objects
Search...

Event Timeline

Ilya2015 created this task.Mar 13 2016, 8:49 AM
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptMar 13 2016, 8:49 AM
Ilya2015 updated the task description. (Show Details)Mar 13 2016, 8:50 AM
Krenair added a project: Wikimedia-Site-requests.Mar 13 2016, 5:39 PM
Restricted Application added subscribers: JEumerus, Matanya. · View Herald TranscriptMar 13 2016, 5:39 PM
Dereckson subscribed.EditedMar 15 2016, 12:12 AM

About the rollback right.

What group should be able to add users to the rollback group?

About Flagged Revisions deployment.

In T58408, ce.wikipedia requested to enable Flagged Revisions like ru.wikipedia.

I'm not comfortable with the format of the discussion: some short arguments have been exposed, and then 13 contributors support the motion, without any comment/thought about the whole impact of Flagged Revisions on the contributions workflow.

What problem are you trying to solve with Flagged Revisions?

Dereckson triaged this task as Medium priority.Mar 15 2016, 12:13 AM
Dereckson moved this task from Backlog to Analysis / under discussion on the Wikimedia-Site-requests board.

[ I'm currently prioritizing the task as normal, with the intent it's for the rollback part. ]

Ilya2015 added a comment.Mar 15 2016, 3:50 PM
In T129766#2120967, @Dereckson wrote:

About the rollback right.

What group should be able to add users to the rollback group?

About Flagged Revisions deployment.

In T58408, ce.wikipedia requested to enable Flagged Revisions like ru.wikipedia.

I'm not comfortable with the format of the discussion: some short arguments have been exposed, and then 13 contributors support the motion, without any comment/thought about the whole impact of Flagged Revisions on the contributions workflow.

What problem are you trying to solve with Flagged Revisions?

I don't know. The sysops from kkwiki asked me to help with the prosess, because they don't know how to do it. I said that they should organize a discussion. The sysops said that the wiki is growing and it's time for trusted users to review edits of other users because of high activity.

About the rollback: sysops should be able to add users to this group.

Dereckson created subtask T130215: Add a rollbacker group on kk.wikipedia.Mar 17 2016, 3:37 PM
Dereckson lowered the priority of this task from Medium to Lowest.Mar 17 2016, 3:39 PM

[ Decrease priority to reflect the current state of deployment of Flagged Revisions on new wikis. This doesn't apply to the rollback part, which will be deployed this evening. ]

Dereckson closed subtask T130215: Add a rollbacker group on kk.wikipedia as Resolved.Mar 18 2016, 12:15 AM
Dereckson added a comment.Mar 18 2016, 6:45 PM
In T130215#2134885, @Ilya2015 wrote:

Thanks. What about flagged revisions? They don't enable them now days?

Indeed, we are currently somewhat reticent for new Flagged Revisions deployments.

We are also willing to support wikis to find better solution for problems like spam, vandalism or more generally non constructive edits.

The best way for that would be to ask the community what concrete problems they currently face.

Dereckson updated the task description. (Show Details)Mar 18 2016, 6:46 PM
Ilya2015 added a comment.Mar 19 2016, 10:08 AM
In T129766#2134896, @Dereckson wrote:
In T130215#2134885, @Ilya2015 wrote:

Thanks. What about flagged revisions? They don't enable them now days?

Indeed, we are currently somewhat reticent for new Flagged Revisions deployments.

We are also willing to support wikis to find better solution for problems like spam, vandalism or more generally non constructive edits.

The best way for that would be to ask the community what concrete problems they currently face.

I see:) What kind of new revisions are they?

Dereckson added a comment.Mar 19 2016, 2:19 PM

AbuseFilter gives particularly good results to detect a specific edit pattern (e.g. death announcement, long term vandalism with edits always the same way, etc.)

Dereckson closed this task as Resolved.Mar 23 2016, 4:41 PM
Dereckson claimed this task.

I mark this task as resolved as we've done in T130215 the rollback part, and there is already T97665 to discuss Flagged Revisions.

Dereckson mentioned this in T97665: Enable FlaggedRevs extension on kk.wikipedia.Mar 23 2016, 4:42 PM
Content licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 unless otherwise noted; code licensed under GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 or later and other open source licenses. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Code of Conduct. · Wikimedia Foundation · Privacy Policy · Code of Conduct · Terms of Use · Disclaimer · CC-BY-SA · GPL · Credits