Page MenuHomePhabricator

Update Collaboration team Herald rules
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Please update the Collaboration team Herald rules as follows:

We're going to try to use milestones instead of the explicit excludes for future quarters, but for now the above should work (I don't think you can change an existing project into a milestone).

For history, see:

Event Timeline

Mattflaschen-WMF changed the task status from Open to Stalled.EditedAug 1 2016, 11:09 PM

I want to check one thing before you make this change.

This is good to go as originally stated.

Mattflaschen-WMF changed the task status from Stalled to Open.Aug 1 2016, 11:22 PM
Danny_B triaged this task as Medium priority.
Danny_B moved this task from To Triage to Herald rules on the Phabricator board.
Danny_B subscribed.

{H26} updated.

Please add back Collaboration-Team-Archive-2015-2016 to the "Projects do not include" list of H26.

I strongly encourage you to use subprojects and/or milestones instead of separate projects though.

Please see my comment above re H26.

We do plan to use milestones for future quarters (the Q1 board was created before we decided on this new/revised plan).

Please add back Collaboration-Team-Archive-2015-2016 to the "Projects do not include" list of H26.

Done. The description was not unambiguous, sorry for noise.

Please see my comment above re H26.

We do plan to use milestones for future quarters (the Q1 board was created before we decided on this new/revised plan).

Phabricator does not notify users on "edit conflicts" and this was a clear example of it...

Please see my comment above re H26.

We do plan to use milestones for future quarters (the Q1 board was created before we decided on this new/revised plan).

It is possible to attach currently separate projects as subprojects or milestones with keeping their boards.

Sorry. This is my fault.

Can you also add Edit-Review-Improvements and Collab-Notifications-Page (it would be nice if that was automatic since it's part of Notifications , but evidently not per T141836) to the "Include any" of H26?

It is possible to attach currently separate projects as subprojects or milestones with keeping their boards.

How can I do that? I know about https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/subprojects/65/ , but I only see options to create projects.

Sorry. This is my fault.

Can you also add Edit-Review-Improvements and Collab-Notifications-Page (it would be nice if that was automatic since it's part of Notifications , but evidently not per T141836) to the "Include any" of H26?

Done.

Thanks, sorry about initially missing those projects, and the back and forth.

(Please do let me know about attaching existing boards as milestones, but that doesn't block resolving the task).

It is possible to attach currently separate projects as subprojects or milestones with keeping their boards.

How can I do that? I know about https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/subprojects/65/ , but I only see options to create projects.

(Please do let me know about attaching existing boards as milestones, but that doesn't block resolving the task).

(For the record: communication followed on IRC, as the task is resolved and this would be different one.)

Really sorry to once again reopen this, but might as well keep it all in one place since it's tightly related:

I forgot that Collab-Team-Q1-July-Sep-2016 is a subproject of Collaboration-Team-Triage (which I think I did because the docs say "Sprint is for sub-projects of a team being worked on in a certain time frame"). So per https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/projects/#subprojects-and-mileston , "When a project tag is added that is the ancestor or descendant of one or more existing tags, the old tags are replaced" (this goes both ways).

So I don't think H180 has any effect, and it should be archived. Sorry.

Correct.

I assumed it is separate project and didn't verify it is subproject.

The same will actually apply to {H26}, so I can modify that one too.

The same will actually apply to {H26}, so I can modify that one too.

After clarification on IRC this has been found as not desired.