Page MenuHomePhabricator

Saying yes (y) continues to all groups
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

18:38:19 Started deploy [parsoid/deploy@dc2323d]: Updating Parsoid to 734dc996
18:38:19 
== CANARY ==
:* wtp2001.codfw.wmnet
:* wtp2002.codfw.wmnet
:* wtp1002.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp1001.eqiad.wmnet
parsoid/deploy: fetch stage(s): 100% (ok: 4; fail: 0; left: 0)                  
parsoid/deploy: config_deploy stage(s): 100% (ok: 4; fail: 0; left: 0)          
parsoid/deploy: promote and restart_service stage(s): 100% (ok: 4; fail: 0; left: 0)
canary deploy successful. Continue? [y]es/[n]o/[c]ontinue all groups: y
18:45:42 
== DEFAULT1 ==
:* wtp2007.codfw.wmnet
:* wtp1018.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp1009.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp1015.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp1022.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp2019.codfw.wmnet
:* wtp1007.eqiad.wmnet
parsoid/deploy: fetch stage(s): 100% (ok: 7; fail: 0; left: 0)                  
parsoid/deploy: config_deploy stage(s): 100% (ok: 7; fail: 0; left: 0)          
parsoid/deploy: promote and restart_service stage(s): 100% (ok: 7; fail: 0; left: 0)
18:46:37 
== DEFAULT2 ==
:* wtp1021.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp1016.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp2008.codfw.wmnet
:* wtp1003.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp1008.eqiad.wmnet
:* wtp2004.codfw.wmnet
:* wtp1023.eqiad.wmnet
parsoid/deploy: fetch stage(s): 100% (ok: 7; fail: 0; left: 0)                  
parsoid/deploy: config_deploy stage(s): 100% (ok: 7; fail: 0; left: 0)          
parsoid/deploy: promote and restart_service stage(s): 100% (ok: 7; fail: 0; left: 0)
... etc ...

Revisions and Commits

rMSCA Scap
Restricted Differential Revision

Event Timeline

mobrovac subscribed.

You can say c once and you will not be prompted any more till the end of the deployment ;)

Ups, sorry misread the ticket. I thought @Arlolra was asking how not to be asked again to continue, but in fact he is experiencing the opposite: when he says y, Scap3 doesn't ask him any more for continuation.

thcipriani triaged this task as Medium priority.Feb 6 2017, 4:59 PM
thcipriani moved this task from Needs triage to Debt on the Scap board.

Looks like I caused the regression rMSCA98247477db5d: Improve failure handling and rollback behavior and called it out in the commit message as a "behavior change". :)

dduvall added a revision: Restricted Differential Revision.Feb 7 2017, 2:23 AM