Story: As a user I prefer if an interface uses terms I am familiar with and which I associate with the correct things (even though no user would write it that way…)
Concern: Several terms that are used in the labeling interface may be unusual for newcomers to the system.
Terms
- "Campaign": A collection of tasks with a common theme (usually related to a specific initiative) that require user judgement.
- Concerns: I personally would associate campaign with political or advertisement campaigns. For a user those may be "tasks", "goals", "change sets" or something like this.
- "Workset": A small batch of tasks for a user to work on. Worksets are drawn from incomplete tasks in a campaign.
- Concerns:
- "Task": A unit of work. Usually an item of some sort (page, revision, user, etc.). A user would be asked to apply some sort of judgement to it in the form of a "label". Tasks can require more than one "label".
- Concerns:
- "Label": A structured judgement from a user. A label can take nearly any form representable as JSON. Plain text, numerical, categorical, etc.
- Concerns: In the current system, users select sort changes into predefined categories (which you can also do by labeling, but I assume the association is not that obvious). Is "categorization" better?