Page MenuHomePhabricator

Remove redundant username from edit summary for moves
Open, Needs TriagePublic

Description

When performing moves the resultant edit summary will currently appear as:
Time, Date‎ Username (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (bytes) (0)‎ . . (Username moved page X to Y: reason)

I think it should be changed back to how it was pre-2012, which appeared as:
Time, Date‎ Username (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (bytes) (0)‎ . . (moved X to Y: reason)

Essentially removing the redundant extra "Username" and the unnecessary "page". The main reason I'm requesting this is because edit summaries have a hard character limit and wasting them on information that is already presented in the same line is frustrating when move edit summaries are often chopped off. Additionally, it makes histories look confusing when a user changes usernames.

This is a continuation of T36961 which was opened when the change was made in 2012 and ultimately closed as WONTFIX because it was supposedly a feature, although exactly why it was a feature was never properly explained IMO. I can't speak for other languages but whenever this has been discussed at enwiki there has been unanimous consensus that the extra username is redundant, see eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_86#The_new.2C_redundant_automatic_edit_summary_on_page_moves_should_be_reverted or the current discussion that prompted this https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)&oldid=809106373#Edit_summaries_for_moves

One suggested solution at the previous task and VPT was to split it into different messages for logs (which is fine as is) and edit summaries (which needs a change at least in English -- I would be fine if it was just made locally configurable and other languages stayed with the current set up if that's what is best for them, although I do note the original task was filed by a Norwegian Wikipedia editor).

Event Timeline

Screen Shot 2017-11-07 at 8.38.42 pm.png (972×2 px, 846 KB)

Here is an example from only a few days ago of many chopped off move summaries (it is from my contributions listing, so anyone viewing it would already know the user performing the action), which would be alleviated by removing the redundant information from the edit summary. I realise that this has been discussed before but I'm bringing it up again because it's something that has frustrated me for over five years now and, having apparently made over 10,000 moves on enwiki, it is an issue that causes me irritation almost daily in my regular editing/administrating.

If there is any further information that I can provide to help please let me know. Thanks.

Note: this refers to the edit summary for the dummy edit generated by page moves in page histories and Special:Contributions, not the summary in Special:Log.

This is a relatively minor issue but it's a nuisance. The redundancy is annoying in itself, as is the truncation of edit summaries. No clear example was provided in the previous ticket of a problem that was solved by this "fix". The best solution, as was suggested five years ago, is probably to make this locally customisable so that individual wikis can decide what information they want to include.

I note that edit summaries are going to be able to be significantly longer soon, 1000 Unicode characters rather than 255 bytes. See T6714: Epic: Increasing the length of the edit summary for the overarching task and T166733: Deploy refactored comment storage to watch the progress.

Current status is that the database schema change to make it possible to store long comments is in progress (step 2 at T166733). Then we can start changing the feature flag to allow MediaWiki to use the new schema (step 3 at T166733), at which point the truncation being complained about here should no longer be an issue. At least until someone updates the web UI to allow people to enter longer comments and people start doing so.