Description
Description
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T205387 Import Editions and Works from Libris | |||
Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T201307 Research including runeberg.org in Biblioteksdata | |||
Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T227470 Import the Runeberg.org catalog to Wikidata | |||
Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T227558 Populate the Libris-connected Runeberg items with data | |||
Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T228256 Identify Runeberg items with Author name strings | |||
Resolved | Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE | T228265 Identify which Runeberg items to populate |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Ended up editing way fewer items than expected this way (ca 60 out of over 5 000 Runeberg items).
Items with Runeberg ID and Libris Editions ID that is sourced to LIBRIS (meaning they were touched by the bot in this run)
The reason being that the vast majority of Runeberg items are not tagged as belonging to Nationalbibliografin in Libris (e.g. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q65525476 → https://libris.kb.se/katalogisering/q71m6kx22tsvbnr). Since only Nationalbibliografin is explicitly CC0, we can't use entries that are not in it. This was quite unexpected, as it's mostly books published in Sweden – though quite old. If we look at the books that are both in Runeberg and in NB, they're newer than average...