We have ZRecord as a hack version of the generic ZObject, because right now ZObject in an interface (and so can't be instantiated).
Should we make our current ZObject a trait rather than an interface?
We have ZRecord as a hack version of the generic ZObject, because right now ZObject in an interface (and so can't be instantiated).
Should we make our current ZObject a trait rather than an interface?
Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Scrap ZRecord, fold everything into ZObject | mediawiki/extensions/WikiLambda | master | +68 -181 |
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | DVrandecic | T261464 Z5/Error type | |||
Resolved | Jdforrester-WMF | T265648 Decide what to do about ZRecord |
Change 644588 had a related patch set uploaded (by Jforrester; owner: Jforrester):
[mediawiki/extensions/WikiLambda@master] Scrap ZRecord, fold everything into ZObject
Change 644588 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/WikiLambda@master] Scrap ZRecord, fold everything into ZObject