Access requests to Google's Search Console are handled by the Core Experiences team with SRE oversight. Requesting creation of a tag that helps identify such requests.
Context: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Search_Console_Data
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | SCherukuwada | T303513 Update Documentation and Process for Access to Search Consoles | |||
| Resolved | Aklapper | T306500 Request new tag: #Search-Console-access-request |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
For the record, SRE is aware of this change (and supports it). Right now, SRE-Access-Requests is used for it (mixing SSH requests and Google Console ones), which has caused confusion with how to be handled by SREs.
Comment Actions
Glad to see this, as this has been a constant source of confusion.
I merged T290711: Clarify where to request adding a site to Google Search Console / Google News feed and who to handle into T303513: Update Documentation and Process for Access to Search Consoles, and added some comments on T303513, because discoverability of processes.
Comment Actions
Requested public project Search-Console-access-request has been created: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/view/5882/
(In case you need to edit the project or project workboard itself at some point and lack permissions, please see Trusted-Contributors.)
Interested people are welcome to join the project as members, and to watch the project in order to receive notifications on task updates.
Recommended practices for project and workboard management in Phabricator are available.
Feel free to bring up any questions you might have about Phabricator or about best ways to manage projects in Phabricator.
I took the liberty to edit https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Search_Console_Data&type=revision&diff=1971247&oldid=1960659
Comment Actions
(For the records, I also silently updated the project tags of 22 existing search console tickets so traces of the past can be found easier).
Comment Actions
Thank you again, I was thinking of doing the same, you were faster and more efficient being able to do it silently!