Personal Information

Name:Shriya Kamat Tarcar
Email ID:shriyakt08@gmail.com
Location:India
Available Working Hours/Week=40+ hours(flexible)

LINKS TO MY RESUME AND PROFILES:
RESUME
TWITTER
LINKEDIN
GITHUB
MEDIUM
METAWIKI
DATA SCIENCE FOR SOCIAL GOOD FELLOWSHIP,UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK,UK
OUTREACHY WEBSITE
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION
OUTREACHY YOUTUBE PODCAST(SETTING YOUR CAREER THROUGH OPEN-SOURCE)

Passionate about leveraging technology for positive societal impact, I am Shriya Kamat Tarcar, a Computer Science Engineer from Goa,India. I possess a diverse skill set spanning from technical documentation,research, data science, software development to open-source development.During my academic tenure at Goa University, I have honed my technical writing skills while maintaining a strong academic record, including achieving a CGPA of 8.53/10.

Professional Experience

From crafting college articles to contributing to poetry, magazines, and newspapers, my writing journey has been diverse and enriching. Through projects like DSSG Fellowship's user guide, final year project reports, and technical documentation for Wikimedia's Outreachy internship, I've honed my ability to communicate complex concepts effectively across various mediums.

I]OUTREACHY-WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION(OPEN-SOURCE INTERNSHIP):
1)INTERNSHIP CERTIFICATE
2)OPEN SOURCE CONTRIBUTION PHASE
3)PROJECT PHASE:
A]SURVEY DOCUMENT
B]TASKS DOCUMENT

I have experience of working independently as well as with international and cross-functional teams.
I was selected as 1 of the 7 Outreachy Interns with the Wikimedia Foundation which afforded me the opportunity to engage in qualitative and quantitative analysis, along with technical documentation, for the "Multilingual Wikipedia Editor Survey" project under the mentorship of Mike Raish(Lead Design Researcher at Wikimedia Foundation).This opportunity marked a turning point in my journey toward technical writing. From this experience, I've embarked on a focused path of skill acquisition and experiential learning aimed at mastering the craft. Along this path, I've immersed myself in diverse technological domains, actively engaged with the Wikimedia Foundation community, and made significant contributions to the "Multilingual Wikipedia Editor Survey" project.I have gained experience of working on wikis, Meta-Wiki, and using wikitext during this internship.

A]Experience with WikiText

1. Amboli, Sindhudurg Article Enhancements

Task: Added a "Natural Wonders" section and a sunset photo.
Wikitext Skills Demonstrated: Utilized wikitext to embed images, create sections, and format text to enhance the visual and informational quality of the article.
Impact: Improved article quality and visitor engagement by providing detailed and visually appealing content.

2. Global Climate and Energy Project Article Description

Task: Composed and integrated a concise project description.
Wikitext Skills Demonstrated: Applied wikitext to succinctly summarize complex information, making it quickly accessible and understandable for readers.
Impact: Streamlined user experience by clearly defining the article’s focus at the outset.

3. Ashan Priyanjan Article Translation

Task: Translated the article to Hindi, enhancing accessibility for Hindi-speaking readers.
Wikitext Skills Demonstrated: Employed wikitext in multilingual settings, demonstrating flexibility and adaptability in content presentation across languages.
Impact: Broadened the reach of the article, making it accessible to a non-English-speaking audience.

B]Experience with WikiText and Meta-Wiki

• Showcasing My Wikitext and Meta-Wiki Skills Through Blogging (My Page)
• During my Outreachy internship with the Wikimedia Foundation, I authored a Series of blog posts on Meta-Wiki, demonstrating my ability to effectively use wikitext and engage with complex content management systems.

1. Wikitext Proficiency: Each blog post required advanced wikitext formatting to structure content, embed links, and ensure proper layout which demonstrates my fluency in handling MediaWiki's markup language.
2. Engaging Content Creation: My blogs, such as "Introduction," "Struggle," "Think About Your Audience," and "Career Goals," showcase my skill in creating engaging and well-structured content that resonates with the community. These posts are not only informative but also formatted to enhance readability and accessibility.
3. Community Interaction: Writing these posts on Meta-Wiki allowed me to interact directly with the Wikimedia community, receiving feedback and participating in discussions, furthering my understanding of the community’s needs and how best to address them.
4. Technical Documentation: My experience mirrors the tasks required in Google Season of Docs, particularly in documenting complex systems in an accessible manner, making me well-prepared to contribute effectively to the MediaWiki documentation efforts.

My BlogPosts:
Introduction
Struggle
Think_About_Your_Audience
Career Goals

Eager to master MediaWiki's architecture, my background with Meta equips me with the skills necessary to fully grasp and contribute to the breadth of this project.

II]DATA SCIENCE FOR SOCIAL GOOD FELLOWSHIP,UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK,UNITED KINGDOM:
1]INTERNSHIP CERTIFICATE
2]OPEN-SOURCE CODE FOR PROJECT
3]POSTER
4]AI SUPERPOWER SHOWCASE 2022,UNITED KINGDOM

Notably,I got selected as 1 of the 15 fellows globally for the Data Science for Social Good Fellowship at the University of Warwick,UK where I collaborated with West Midlands Combined Authority and Pure Leapfrog to predict energy efficiencies, contributing to regional carbon neutrality goals in the West Midlands.

My proficiency in technical documentation is demonstrated through this project. I adeptly utilized markdown to craft clear and organized README files for the project as well as each folder, facilitating easy understanding and replication of project methodologies and data processes. This helped to enhance accessibility and usability for fellow collaborators and future users.I crafted user guides and manual instruction documents by distilling complex technical information into clear and accessible language tailored to stakeholder needs. I organized the documentation logically, provided step-by-step instructions, and incorporated stakeholder feedback to ensure usability.
Presented this project in various international data science conferences namely:“DataFest 2022,Shard,London,UK”,“Learning and Doing Data For Good Conference 2022,USA” and “How Might We Target UK Homes, To Make Them More Energy Efficient?,Geovation.”

III]TIMBLE LAW ASSOCIATES
WORK REPORT

During my work as a Developer Intern at Timble Law Associates, I took charge of website development, feature implementation, and chat flow optimization using HubSpot. However, a pivotal aspect of my role revolved around creating technical documentation. This entailed meticulously documenting processes and functionalities, thereby streamlining operations and enhancing efficiency within the team.

At Timble Law Associates, I created and maintained critical documentation to support website development and chatflow optimization. I skillfully documented the firm’s legal services and developed comprehensive software design documentation, functional requirements, and feature-oriented guides. My work provided clear, essential insights to project managers and developers, ensuring effective project execution. Collaborating closely with engineering leaders, I produced detailed guides that became key resources for the development team, enhancing project clarity and coherence throughout its lifecycle.

IV]SAWO LABS
1)Internship Certificate
2)Social Media Shoutout
3)Twitter(Emerged among Top 4 champs of the week)

During my internship at SAWO Labs, I excelled as a Developer Champ, demonstrating prowess in technical documentation, integration, bug reporting, and community engagement. With a focus on developer documentation, I crafted tutorials, how-to guides, and API documentation, ensuring clarity and usability across diverse platforms. Leveraging Docs-as-Code principles, I played a vital role in seamlessly integrating the SAWO API into frameworks like Gatsby, Next.js, Nuxt.js, and WordPress, while consistently providing valuable feedback to enhance user experience.

V]FINAL YEAR THESIS & RESEARCH PUBLICATION
1)Github
2)Report
3)Paper
4)Instruction Manual

For my final year thesis in Computer Engineering, I developed a face recognition system that utilized advanced algorithms like Haar Cascade and MTCNN for precise detection and PCA for analyzing facial embeddings. I crafted comprehensive documentation, including a detailed project report, an instruction manual with step-by-step guidance and troubleshooting tips, and a research paper that highlighted the latest developments in facial recognition technology. This documentation enhanced the system's usability in various settings and fostered further research, effectively bridging the gap between sophisticated technology and practical application.

VI]PROJECTS
In my capacity as a technical writer, I meticulously crafted detailed README files for multiple projects like:
1)My Profile README
2)Happify-Me-For-PCCE
3)NewsNinja
4)The-New-Normal
5)PinkSafe
These project documentations were meticulously structured to provide clear and concise guidance, exemplifying my expertise in documentation. They stand as a testament to my proficiency in conveying complex technical information effectively.

VII]ACE OF COMPUTER ENGINEERS MAGAZINE,ETHOS MAGAZINE AND THE GOAN DAILY NEWSPAPER
Link To My Writings

I have a strong background in technical writing, demonstrated through my work on open-source technology,radio communication, cloud computing, user engagement,SAWO-One Tap Authentication Service and my journey as a Developer Champ at SAWO Labs for notable publications like the Association of Computer Engineers Magazine and Ethos Magazine. My experience also includes writing for the Navhind Times,the goan news daily on a variety of topics from cultural insights to technological innovations like Goa's DISHTAVO system. I'm eager to apply these skills to the MediaWiki documentation project at Wikimedia, aiming to make information accessible and comprehensive for all users.

VIII]MICROSOFT LEARN STUDENT AMBASSADOR
1]Certificate
2]Poster
3]Event
During my tenure as a Microsoft Learn Student Ambassador, I led workshops on Git and GitHub, creating visually engaging PowerPoint presentations and soliciting feedback to refine content. I mentored peers, designed interactive forms, and facilitated collaborative learning sessions, showcasing my ability to distill complex concepts into accessible content. My commitment to continuous learning is evidenced by my completion of Microsoft Learn Courses and a comprehensive portfolio, demonstrating proficiency in diverse Microsoft Technologies. Eager to contribute to GSOD at Wikimedia, I aim to leverage my technical expertise and passion for knowledge sharing to produce impactful documentation.

IX]Medium:
My Medium Account
My portfolio of published articles on Medium demonstrates my versatility and depth in technical communication. Covering topics from Google Developer Student Clubs-WOW Event Highlights to Google Cloud innovations and one-tap authentication services, these pieces reflect my capacity to break down complex technological subjects and present them engagingly and informatively.

Links to my published articles:
1)Precious-Moments-DSC-WOW
2)The Radio
3)30 Days Of Google Cloud
4)SAWO-One Tap Authentication Service

X]REDDIT,STACKOVERFLOW,QUORA:
I actively engaged with the wider developer community by participating in discussions on platforms like Quora, Stack Overflow, and Reddit, providing insightful answers, troubleshooting tips, and fostering a collaborative knowledge-sharing environment.
My presence on Quora, Stack Overflow, and Reddit allowed me to contribute to technical dialogues, offer solutions to complex queries, and share my expertise, thereby strengthening community support and driving the collective learning journey.

XI]OPEN-SOURCE
Participated in Outreachy Open-Source Contribution Period(Oct 23-Nov 23) where I contributed to open-source projects of Wikimedia Foundation,Oppia and HOTOSM.Also participated in Open-Source Programmes like Girlscript Summer Of Code, Hacktoberfest(every year since 2020), OpenForce and contributed to various open-source projects.

1]DATA SCIENCE FOR SOCIAL GOOD FELLOWSHIP,UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK,UK
OPEN-SOURCE CODE FOR OUR PROJECT:
https://github.com/DSSGxUK/s22_wmca
2]OPPIA:
MERGED PULL REQUEST:
https://github.com/oppia/oppia/pull/19082#issuecomment-1817450937
3]HOTOSM:
OPEN SOURCE CONTRIBUTION PHASE:
https://github.com/hotosm/fmtm/issues/863#issuecomment-1779575126

All of these experiences have been instrumental in sculpting and amplifying my skills as a technical writ

Skills

A]Technical:
1)Technical Writing:Markdown,Latex,MkDocs,SphinxSwagger,Overleaf,Hashnode,Dev.to,GitHub gist,Postman,Confluence,Google Docs,Notion,Medium,
Langauges:Python, SQL, C/C++
2)Web Development:HTML, CSS, and JavaScript,Hugo, Gatsby,React.js, Bootstrap
3)Data Science:Jupyter Notebook,Google Collab,Statistics, EDA, Data Analysis & Visualization, Numpy, Pandas, MatPlotlib, Seaborn, Pytorch, Tensorflow, Scikit-Learn, Machine Learning, Predictive Modelling, Deep Learning, Pattern Recognition,Artifical Intelligence
4)Software Tools:Git,Github,Jira,Monday.com,Power BI, Tableau, StreamLit, MS Excel, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Figma, Adobe XD,GitLab, Visual Studio Code,Google Cloud,Google Analytics
5)Operating Systems:Windows,Linux,MAC OS
6)CS Fundamentals:Engineering Mathematics,Digital Logic and Design,Computer Organization and Architecture,Programming and Data Structures, Algorithms,Theory of Computation,Compiler Design, Operating System,Databases,Computer Networks

B]Soft Skills:
Technical Writing & Editing,Report Writing,Instruction Manual Writing ,Communication, Problem-Solving, Presentation, Critical Thinking,Teamwork, Analytical Thinking, Leadership,Search Engine Optimization(like Google Scholar) ,Adaptibility,Detail-Oriented

C]Langauges:
English,Hindi,Konkani,Marathi,Sanskrit

Achievements

1)Machine Learning Quiz Winner, DevFest India 2021
2)Top 13 Teams Shortlisted, Hack4She National Level Hackathon (Project: PinkSafe)
3)Topper,Scaler Edge Apex(National Coding Contest)
4)Web3 Conference Goa 2023
5)Dan Kohn Scholarship Recipient for KubeCon+CloudNativeCon Europe 2023 due to my contributions in cloud-native computing
6)Winner,Best Landing Page Competition,Hexcoderz,Techyon,PCCE,Goa
7)Awarded National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning(NPTEL) Star twice (NPTEL Believer and NPTEL Enthusiast)
8)Selected as a Scholar for the UI/UX Design Course in Education Outreach Program Batch 11 powered by Girlscript Foundation
9)Completed the "30 Days Of Google Cloud" in Cloud Engineering Track and Data Science and Machine Learning Track
10)Winner,Financial Literacy Quiz by Girlscript Foundation
11)Got my Spark AR effect approved and accepted by Reskilll X Spark AR Initiative
12)Idea Presentation Competition 2022 Winner,World Water Day,PCCE,Goa[HardCopy Of Certificate Provided]

Extra-Curricular Activities

I love participating in hackathons,coding competitions and community program initiatives(I have been a Microsoft Learn Student Ambassador[Beta])Beyond the realms of technology, my enthusiasm extends to diverse interests, like acting on national television,being a radio jockey on All India Radio and 92.7 BIG FM,taking part in debate,fancy-dress,dance,drawing and sanskrit shloka competitions.I'm on a journey to make an impact both in and outside the tech sphere.

In conclusion, I am confident that my blend of technical writing skills, academic background, and hands-on experience make me a strong candidate for the Technical Writer role with the Mediawiki project. I am excited about the prospect of contributing to this dynamic project and playing a role in advancing MediaWiki through clear and comprehensive documentation.

Why I am the suitable candidate for this role?

Based on my expertise in user-analysis research and data gathering, I am well-equipped to enhance the user experience on MediaWiki documentation. My ability to gather feedback from the community and create comprehensive user-persona case studies enables me to tailor documentation effectively.

Moreover, my proficiency in various flavors of Markdown showcases my adaptability and willingness to learn new technologies, including Wikitext. I am eager to leverage my skills and experience to contribute to the MediaWiki project, collaborating with the team and community to achieve our shared goals.
In addition, my unique combination of technical writing skills, familiarity with Wikitext, and experience in open-source environments, particularly with Wikimedia Projects, makes me an ideal candidate for this role. I am committed to addressing duplication issues, streamlining content, and implementing efficient organization practices to ensure a seamless migration of MediaWiki documentation.

As a technical writer dedicated to enhancing user experiences through clear and concise documentation, I am enthusiastic about the opportunity to contribute to the complete migration of MediaWiki documentation. I look forward to collaborating with the team and achieving our shared goals. I've made valuable edits to the MediaWiki documentation utilizing wikitext.

Project Statement

Project Title:Enhancing MediaWiki Documentation: Consolidation and Organization

Introduction:
In the vast landscape of online documentation, MediaWiki stands out as a pivotal platform, powering sites like Wikipedia and serving various organizations worldwide with its robust, open-source wiki software. Despite its extensive use, the documentation for MediaWiki is currently split between Meta-Wiki and MediaWiki.org, leading to fragmented and occasionally outdated information. This split not only complicates the user and contributor experience but also impedes the maintenance and updating of the documentation.

Problem:
The essential function of documentation within MediaWiki has been hampered by the historical division of its content across two distinct platforms: Meta-Wiki and MediaWiki.org. While MediaWiki.org was designated as the primary site for hosting comprehensive documentation, a significant portion of material remains scattered on Meta-Wiki. This dispersal presents several challenges:
1. Redundancy and Overlap: There exists considerable overlap between the pages on Meta-Wiki and MediaWiki.org. However, because of licensing constraints and the presence of corresponding pages that already exist on MediaWiki.org, direct importation of content from Meta-Wiki is not feasible. This redundancy complicates the process for users seeking specific information and burdens documentation maintainers with inconsistent and duplicated content.
2. Outdated Information: Many of the MediaWiki documentation pages still hosted on Meta-Wiki have become outdated. Without a systematic process for updates and review, these pages fail to provide the most current and relevant information to users, thereby diminishing the utility and reliability of the documentation as a whole.
3. Specificity to Wikimedia Projects: Some of the documentation on Meta-Wiki is uniquely tailored to how MediaWiki is used within Wikimedia projects. This specificity means that while certain content is crucial for Wikimedia project contexts and should remain on Meta, it unnecessarily clutters general MediaWiki documentation for broader audiences.
4. Contributor Engagement and Strategy: Historically, the migration and maintenance of documentation have suffered from a lack of sustained contributor engagement. Volunteers and contributors often initiate documentation projects but may not see them through to completion, leading to stalled or incomplete content migration. Additionally, there is a noted absence of a cohesive strategy to manage and expedite this migration process efficiently as mentioned by Benoît Evellin in T181380

My Approach:

Phase 1: Integrate and Update Existing Documentation
Objective: Efficiently integrate and update existing documentation listed under MediaWiki_documentation_on_Meta-Wiki/List#Has_MediaWiki.org_equivalent.

Actions:
1.Performing in-depth content assessment:
From my research, it has become clear that maintaining documentation has been challenging due to the presence of corresponding pages.
Page-by-Page Content Comparison:Conduct a thorough comparison of each Meta-Wiki page that has a corresponding page on MediaWiki.org.
Review Of Content:Utilize a comparison tool like MediaWiki diff along with a manual side-by-side review to identify discrepancies, missing information, or content redundancy.

2. Strategic Content Integration:
Missing Information: Integrate any missing or outdated information from Meta-Wiki into the corresponding MediaWiki.org page. Ensure accuracy, consistency, and completeness of the consolidated content.
Elimination of Duplicate Content: Identify and remove redundant sections from either platform to streamline the documentation and avoid user confusion.
Content Enhancement: Adapt the Meta-Wiki content to fit the style and format standards of MediaWiki.org, including adjusting language tone, technical terms, and presentation formats.

3. Validation Of Content and Legal Compliance:
Licensing Compliance Verification:Check all content for compliance with the licensing requirements specific to MediaWiki.org, ensuring all integrated content adheres to legal standards.
Licensing Adaptation and Community Collaboration: I will work closely with MediaWiki's technical writers and community to address and resolve GFDL and CC-BY-SA licensing issues. Our goal will be to create legally compliant solutions for adapting and migrating content from MetaWiki to MediaWiki.I am also dedicated to refining the content management approach, ensuring new MediaWiki pages comply with Creative Commons and GNU Free Documentation License standards.
Content Rewriting: For content with restrictive licensing, rewrite sections to convey the same information while adhering to MediaWiki.org's licensing guidelines.

4. Collaboration and Feedback:
Establishment of Community Feedback Mechanism: Establish a feedback mechanism so that the technical writers and community members review and comment on the updated documentation before final publication.
Incorporation of Community Insights:Incorporate the technical writers’ and community’s feedback to refine documentation, enhancing its accuracy and relevance. Implement final edits based on this feedback.

5. Documentation Redirection and Tracking:
Setup of Redirections: Set up appropriate redirects from Meta-Wiki to the updated pages on MediaWiki.org, ensuring a seamless transition for users.
Migration Documentation: Maintain a log or tracking system to document the migration process, including migrated content, resolved licensing issues, and any redirects implemented.
Enhancements Through Cross-Linking: Implement strategic cross-links between related pages on MediaWiki.org and Meta-Wiki. This effort aims to improve information accessibility and enrich the user's learning path.

Phase 2: Creation of Missing Documentation
Objective: Create and establish new pages on MediaWiki.org for topics identified under MediaWiki_documentation_on_Meta-Wiki/List#No_MediaWiki.org_equivalent that currently lack adequate documentation.

Actions:
1. Gap Analysis and Content Planning:
Identifying topics from Meta-Wiki:Identify topics from Meta-Wiki that require new documentation on MediaWiki.org.
Planning content structure and layout: Plan content structure and layout in advance, considering the best practices for readability and user engagement.
Content Evaluation: Assess the relevance and importance of the content on these Meta-Wiki pages for the MediaWiki user base. Prioritize content that addresses significant gaps in the existing MediaWiki.org documentation.

2.Engaging and Informative Content Creation:
Content Creation: Develop new pages on MediaWiki.org that comprehensively cover the information from the selected Meta-Wiki pages.Make sure that the new pages are both informative and engaging, ensuring the content provides value to both new users and experienced practitioners.
Image Management for Comprehensive Documentation:Image management is vital for enhancing the comprehensiveness and visual appeal of the documentation on MediaWiki.org. Considerations include:
Ensuring visual consistency by transferring relevant images from Meta-Wiki to MediaWiki.org, contributing to a seamless user experience.Along with addressing legal and licensing considerations when transferring images to maintain compliance and prevent copyright violations.For Eg:Utilizing images from Wikimedia Commons, which typically have appropriate licensing, can streamline the process and mitigate legal risks associated with image usage.[I have done this in my previous work with MediaWiki during the Outreachy Internship-you can check out my blog posts for the same]
Formatting and Style: Adhere to established MediaWiki.org documentation standards and formatting guidelines for consistency and user experience.
Clarity and Comprehensiveness: Present the information clearly, logically, and in a user-friendly manner, including relevant examples and usage instructions.Use rich media, such as diagrams, code snippets, and screenshots, to enhance textual content and aid comprehension.

3.Licensing Considerations in Content Creation
Verification of Licensing Compliance:Me along with the technical writers and community members should verify that all newly created content adheres to the guidelines and licensing requirements of MediaWiki.org and any content transferred from Meta-Wiki is thoroughly checked to ensure it complies with MediaWiki.org's licensing standards.Adherence to the protocol outlined in Meta:MetaProject to transfer content to MediaWiki.org/si , should be ensured to maintain consistency and follow established procedures.
Incorporation of External Content:If external sources are referenced or incorporated into the new documentation, we have to ensure that they meet the appropriate licensing standards of MediaWiki.org.
Help Page Consideration: Special attention is given to pages intended for the "Help" namespace as stated in the project proposal, as they may have specific licensing requirements.

4. Community Collaboration for Content Review:
Internal Review: Involve technical writers,MediaWiki experts and community members in reviewing the newly created pages for practical needs,accuracy, clarity, and completeness.During this review, group the newly created pages into subject areas for better organization and navigation. This will help users easily find relevant information on specific topics.
Assessment of Pages Within Subject Areas:During the audit of newly created pages within each subject area, the focus will lie on identifying missing information crucial for enhancing the completeness and relevance of MediaWiki.org documentation. Determining the optimal placement of supplementary details within the existing documentation structure is crucial for coherence.
Community Feedback: Seek feedback from the broader MediaWiki community on the new content through established communication channels.
Iterative Improvement: Based on feedback, revise and refine the new pages based on assessment findings to ensure they meet user needs and effectively address knowledge gaps.Implementation of necessary changes will ensure comprehensive, relevant, and gap-free documentation.

5. Usability Testing ,Optimization and Publish:
Usability testing with a subset of end-users: Usability testing with a subset of end-users to evaluate the ease of navigation and information retrieval within the new documentation.
Refining and optimizing content based on testing outcomes:Refine and optimize content based on testing outcomes to ensure superior user experience.
Publishing:Upon completion of the content review and approval process, proceed to publish the updates on MediaWiki.org, ensuring that the revised documentation is readily accessible to users.

Phase 3: Organization and Usability Enhancement
Objective: Enhance the organization and usability of WMF-specific content listed under Project:MediaWiki_documentation_on_Meta-Wiki/List#Actually_WMF-specific.

This phase encompasses an array of pages tailored to support the WMF community (contributors, researchers, editors, etc.) in various tasks such as user management, logins etc.

Challenges:
Discoverability: Due to their location on Meta-Wiki, these pages might not be easily discovered by users primarily focused on MediaWiki documentation.
Maintainability: Scattered content can be challenging to update and maintain over time.

Actions:
1. Content Review and User Research:
Content Review:Conduct a detailed review of all WMF-specific content to determine current usage patterns and areas needing improvement.Identify outdated or irrelevant content for revision or removal.
User Research: Understand how users currently find and utilize WMF-specific documentation. This could involve user interviews, surveys, or analyzing access logs.[I have conducted many informational interviews during my Outreachy project “Multilingual Wikipedia Editor Survey,so that experience would be helpful]

2.Information Architecture Design:
Structure Optimization: Based on the content review and user research, design an improved information architecture for WMF-specific content.
Categorization: Organize pages into clear,well-defined,intuitive and user-friendly categories based on topic or project.
Tagging: Implement a tagging and metadata system to allow for easier discovery based on relevant keywords.
Navigation: Design a clear navigation structure within Meta-Wiki or link prominently from MediaWiki.org for easy access.

3. Implementation and User/Stakeholder Feedback Integration:
Implementation: Apply the chosen information architecture to organize WMF-specific content on Meta-Wiki. This may involve moving pages, creating category structures, and implementing tagging systems. Roll out the new organizational structure in stages, allowing users to adapt to changes gradually.
User Feedback Integration: Collect and integrate user and stakeholders feedback to refine the organizational tweaks, ensuring the new system meets the needs of a diverse user base.

4. Maintenance Strategy:
Maintenance Plan: Develop a clear plan for ongoing maintenance of WMF-specific content. This includes establishing regular reviews and forming guidelines for updating information, managing contributor access, and version control.This will also include roles, procedures, and schedules to ensure the continuous upkeep of MediaWiki documentation, guaranteeing its relevance and accuracy over time.Introduce versioning systems to monitor alterations and updates systematically, fostering transparency and responsibility within the content.

5.Communication and Collaboration:
Community Volunteer Engagement:Engage with a dedicated team of community volunteers and take their assistance with the ongoing maintenance and updating of the documentation.
Community Engagement: Engage with the MediaWiki community and WMF teams to gather feedback on the work and usability of the WMF-specific content.
Collaboration: Encourage WMF-specific content contributions from relevant stakeholders.

Through my approach we will be able to achieve this goals:
Reduce Pages Requiring Migration: Aim to reduce the number of pages requiring migration to MediaWiki.org from 91 to 0, ensuring comprehensive coverage and accessibility of documentation.
Enhance Organization and Usability: Improve the organization and usability of Meta-Wiki pages related to MediaWiki, making them easier to use and maintain for community members and contributors.
Foster Collaboration: Foster a collaborative and inclusive documentation ecosystem within the MediaWiki community, ensuring that documentation remains relevant and valuable to users and contributors alike.
Encouraging Contributor Efforts: Foster a supportive environment by recognizing and celebrating contributors' efforts, encouraging active participation in documentation updates.
Providing Daily Logs:Share daily progress logs with the mentors to keep them informed about project developments and encourage transparency in the documentation process.
Final Report Preparation:Compile a comprehensive final report detailing project outcomes, achievements, and key learnings, providing stakeholders with a clear understanding of the project's impact.
Checkpoint Calls:Schedule regular checkpoint calls with team members to review progress, address challenges, and adjust strategies as needed, fostering a collaborative and adaptive project environment.
Continuous Learning and Adaptation:Embrace a culture of continuous learning and adaptation by staying updated with the latest documentation strategies and technologies.

Timeline:

Before May 20:

• Continue making contributions to the organization by actively participating in relevant discussions, contributing edits, and engaging with the community.
• Dive deeper into user documentation, familiarizing yourself with the structure, content, and style of existing documentation on Meta-Wiki and MediaWiki.org.

May 20 - June 1: Project Kickoff and Onboarding (2 weeks)

• Establish clear communication channels with mentors, project members, and stakeholders to ensure effective collaboration throughout the project.
• Review your compiled list of unconsolidated pages on Meta-Wiki and identify potential areas for improvement or consolidation.
• Conduct detailed discussions with mentors to analyze project goals, scope, and requirements, refining your understanding of the project objectives.
• Set up accounts, access necessary tools, and familiarize yourself with the project plan, goals, and timelines.
• Develop a comprehensive plan for project execution, outlining specific tasks, timelines, and responsibilities.
• Determine the frequency and format of project updates and check-ins with mentors and project members.

June 2 - June 29: Phase 1: De-duplication (4 weeks)

• Utilize your compiled list of duplicated pages on Meta-Wiki to systematically identify duplicate content and corresponding MediaWiki.org equivalents.
• Engage in thorough content audits, comparing Meta-Wiki pages with their counterparts on MediaWiki.org to identify redundant or overlapping information.
• Prioritize pages for consolidation based on relevance, usage, and community feedback.
• Begin the process of removing duplicate content from Meta-Wiki and updating MediaWiki.org pages with any missing information.
• Work closely with mentors and project members to ensure accuracy, completeness, and consistency across documentation platforms.
• Regularly update progress reports and seek feedback on de-duplication efforts to address any challenges or discrepancies promptly.

June 30 - August 31: Phase 2: New Content (9 weeks)

• Review Meta-Wiki pages listed under "No MediaWiki.org equivalent" and identify areas requiring new content creation or enhancement on MediaWiki.org.
• Develop a structured approach for writing new documentation for MediaWiki.org, focusing on clarity, accuracy, and relevance to users.
• Collaborate with mentors and project members to create detailed outlines for new content, ensuring alignment with project goals and community needs.
• Engage in a feedback loop with stakeholders, incorporating their input into the development process to improve the quality and usability of the documentation.
• Regularly review and update progress reports, tracking the completion status of each documentation page and addressing any bottlenecks or challenges proactively.
• Finalize and publish new content on MediaWiki.org, ensuring proper attribution, formatting, and integration with existing documentation.

September 1 - September 29: Phase 3: Organization (4 weeks)

• Conduct a comprehensive review of Wikimedia-specific content on Meta-Wiki, identifying opportunities to improve information architecture and organization.
• Collaborate with mentors and stakeholders to develop a structured plan for reorganizing Meta-Wiki content, focusing on usability, discoverability, and maintenance.
• Implement changes to Meta-Wiki pages based on the revised information architecture, ensuring logical categorization and clear navigation paths for users.
• Gather feedback from the community on the proposed organizational changes, incorporating their suggestions and addressing any concerns or usability issues.
• Conduct thorough testing of the updated Meta-Wiki pages to ensure a seamless user experience and effective dissemination of information.
• Document the process of organization and information architecture design, outlining best practices and lessons learned for future reference and knowledge sharing. **

September 30 - October 12: Phase 4: User Feedback (2 weeks)
Conduct Q&A sessions and surveys with community members and users to gather feedback on the updated Meta-Wiki pages and information architecture.
Analyze feedback received from the community, identifying trends, common issues, and areas for improvement.
Collaborate with mentors and project members to prioritize and address feedback, making necessary revisions to enhance usability and user satisfaction.
Communicate with stakeholders to share insights from user feedback sessions and solicit additional input or suggestions for further improvements.

October 13 - October 26: Project Wrap-Up (2 weeks)
Implement user feedback by making final revisions and adjustments to the Meta-Wiki pages and information architecture as needed.
Complete any remaining cleanup tasks, such as reviewing and revising outdated or obsolete documentation.
Identify any follow-up work, additional tasks, and potential areas for improvement required to ensure the long-term sustainability of the documentation consolidation efforts.
Write a comprehensive project report detailing the outcomes, learnings, best practices, and recommendations for future projects.
Finalize and publish the project report for stakeholders and the wider community, summarizing the project journey and highlighting key achievements and insights.

I am flexible and willing to adjust the timeline as needed to accommodate project requirements and ensure optimal outcomes.

Proposed Budget:$10,500