https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/RT
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/RT_Flow
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ops_Clinic_Duty
https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/RT/Reporting_issues

https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:RT

https://office.wikimedia.org/wiki/RT

(Only relevant about ops members trying to file a private ticket: I had one user with ops powers who got confused by the "Visible to" and "Editable by" fields on https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/ trying to restrict access via these fields. Note that those fields are NOT displayed to average Phab users and they are way above the "Security" dropdown but might be worth to tell ops members.)

so on the old pages we will link (or even redirect) to new docs about phabricator, right?

but what is our target URL? https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Phabricator doesn't look yet like it would help a user much

do we first we need task "make wiki documentation related to phab" or is it just not on Wikitech?

'How to use Phabricator' type of documentation can go to mw:Phabricator/etc. Documentation about processes handled in RT that will be now handled in Phabricator can stay where it is now (most likely wikitech:). Does this make sense?

@Qgil @Andre are you guys planning to tackle this?

@Aklapper, I'm working on https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Phabricator/versus_RT and the blog post. Can you take this one, please?

@Aklapper has added a banner to all the pages linked in the description above, and has done the very basic edits to warn users about the new Phabricator-based process.

I think the rest belongs to the SRE team.

The part of this task strictly related with the RT migration (basic update of links and references to RT / Bugzilla i solved.

The remaining work is basically about documenting the new processes that SRE is ironing after the RT migration.

Removing the RT-Migration tag.

I think this can be closed now.

SRE: Anything specifically left to do here or can this be closed?