No technical blockers to this VLAN have public IPs that I know of. Agreed that the switchover would be difficult to make transparent to users. It's possible adding an interface to the neutron router for a new subnet in the existing VLAN would allow cutover to be faster but its probably more trouble than it's worth -- would need to test it out a bit.
Mon, Oct 15
Thu, Oct 11
Wed, Oct 10
Thanks, I misunderstood the scope here. Leaving open :)
@LarsWirzenius can you link your WMF account to your user profile on phab? https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/LarsWirzenius/ right now I see it links to https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?title=User:LarsWirzenius.
Tue, Oct 9
tentatively resolving this as part of T205563
Wed, Oct 3
Tue, Oct 2
I had a few minutes so I looked at this because it would be super swell to have it rigged up. It's a bit complicated at the moment.
Fri, Sep 28
Tue, Sep 25
Mon, Sep 24
Oh hey :). I was going to knock it out for ya but awesome. I will yep
Sep 19 2018
further work in T204160 where we determined we are moving forward with a task type trial
Sep 17 2018
There is logic in the NAT controller to exclude certain destination addresses from NAT (IIUC) and potentially dding the 10. range for eqiad instances would allow preservation of source addresses here?
@20after4 is the issue that hte field is not hidden on an edit form even though it's hidden on creation forms? Let's sync up on this today if you have a minute
Sep 16 2018
@20after4 have any idea why it's still showing up? Oddly I do not see it
Sep 13 2018
Yes apologies, we reconsidered shortly after we added it to the default advanced edit form. We can look at cleaning up the couple outliers if it's an issue and for now we are looking at better ways to both have specific criteria for security/risk oriented tasks and leave existing things as unaffected as possible.
Sep 12 2018
. @20after4 and I are talking about doing a few things:
re-opening so we can figure something out, totally down for risk rating not showing on regular advanced tasks. @20after4 and I are talking about doing a few things:
Talked to @20after4 for a bit about this and we added it to the advanced form. Let's see how this works out.
Sep 11 2018
Sep 10 2018
Sep 5 2018
stat1002 does not exist anymore, and this assessment is old. closed in favor of other tasks.
Sep 4 2018
As part of revitalizing the security group here we are reviewing our workflow processes :)