Related Etherpad: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Jade_summary_data_use_cases

As discussed in last week's Scoring Staff meeting, the issue is that semantically, "null" doesn't mean "I don't know" – it means "there is no data." So we need a more explicit "I don't know" indicator.

Pieces of data I am interested in:

Notes are in https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/JADE_potential_UI_integrations

This use case is de-prioritized.

This use case is de-prioritized.

Would it be possible to take another look at the extension? The concerns originally raised should be addressed by now.

The work product created from this task may need to change depending on the outcome of T208748. As I've been looking into what kind of product JADE should be, I am beginning to scope the work around JADE in terms of different use cases. The interfaces should be designed should be done with the use cases in mind.

Is this the idea to add the J symbol next to revisions, or something else?

I put together a spreadsheet comparing various wikis according to what extensions were installed and what third-party services were available to the users of those wikis. Spreadsheet is available here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WH-srlQulQMT_5BHq4BTfiYoQ1k4mZqTarjFe08V4zw/edit#gid=0. Let me know if there's something that should be explained.

Is this still ongoing?

This task is kind of vaguely worded but I think my ~60 emails to JADE stakeholders will suffice for the task. I will close as completed.

I don't want us to overthink CirrusSearch integration since I am not sure how much value there is for it. I imagine researchers would want to use more specialized tools, rather than pretending that the search engine is a relational database. At minimum, searching for key words used in judgments and being able to associate judgments with articles seem like the main requirements. Being able to do specialized searches like judgmentauthor:Harej would be cool, but I'm not convinced it's a priority.

In communications about JADE I often state that JADE is a system for diff- and revision-level annotations. Consistent with that description of JADE, I think it would make the most sense to proceed with either "labels," "annotations," or another term along those lines.