I have just summarized Olaf's procedure for a report as part of my work at WMNL, and that has made me quite aware that Olaf has built his (really great!) procedure based on what currently *can* be measured with the available tools landscape.

This list is now live at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Metadata_standards_and_Wikimedia

Not sure how @Susannaanas feels about it, but IMO this task is still valid. A maps warper is a valuable tool for Wikimedia Commons, and it does make sense to make it compatible with structured data. Not sure how to resource this and how to make this happen though.

IMO, it does make sense to keep this task open (although unassigned).

Thanks for the reminder! This task is done. We haven't gone very deeply but have mapped areas of inspiration and created a spreadsheet with contacts.

In T249690#6200455, @David_Haskiya_WMSE wrote:

@SandraF_WMF Would it be helpful if I spread the word also via my channels?

I have now moved the list to mainspace on meta.wikimedia.org and extended it quite a bit. Still more to add, but we're slowly getting somewhere:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Metadata_standards_and_Wikimedia

We internally compiled a list of standards, and I'm now moving these to a page on meta.wikimedia.org (currently preparing in my userspace):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SandraF_(WMF)/GLAM_metadata_standards_inventory

@Nikerabbit I'm wondering if we're good to go on this one, or is any action still needed from our side?

Here's a Wikidata query of institutions that are described in the OpenGLAM Survey, with their Commons categories: https://w.wiki/LkJ

Putting this under the attention of technical scoping by WMSE, as this is a typical bug fix to a crucial tool, which would have large impact when fixed.

All SDC pilot projects have concluded and have been summarized / reported on.
A good overview can be found here:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/GLAM

This pilot project is finished, and reported on.

Actually we ended up working with another art museum: the Jakob Smitsmuseum in Mol, Belgium.

All SDC pilot projects have concluded and have been summarized / reported on.

Still a very valid task, but it indeed makes no sense to have this assigned to me. Maybe @Sadads has ideas if this should be assigned to someone else, or just kept as an unassigned but valid task in general?

I'd say the video is ready. As far as I'm concerned, this task can be happily closed.

@jcrespo and @herron - just checking in, do you think this will work? Let me know if I can do anything to help.

Thanks both! I just emailed the .mbox file to @jcrespo - it's not small (44MB) so let's see how this goes.

Update: I @SandraF_WMF have access to the mbox file and can send it to whomever can do the archives import. Please ping me when that's possible.

The blog post is published! https://space.wmflabs.org/2019/12/07/how-can-structured-data-on-commons-wikidata-and-wikisource-walk-hand-in-hand-a-pilot-project-with-punjabi-qisse/

This pilot is concluded!

The blog post is live! https://space.wmflabs.org/2019/12/13/data-roundtripping-a-new-frontier-for-glam-wiki-collaborations/

And the post is live !!! 🕺 https://space.wmflabs.org/2019/11/26/introducing-isa-a-cool-tool-for-adding-structured-data-on-commons/ 💃

Adding to the WMSE-Tools-for-Partnerships-2019-Blueprinting tracking board, because we are looking whether something like this would be in scope for that work.

Absolutely - the draft is up for review there now.

Thank you! Much appreciated 😀

The workflow is documented here:

We received two major pieces of feedback on mapping GLAM ontologies to StructuredDataOnCommons

However, another campaign-oriented approach for adding StructuredDataOnCommons was explored in GLAM pilot projects: doing structured data contributions to existing Wikimedia Commons files, with the ISA tool.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 ended up not using StructuredDataOnCommons for various reasons unfortunately.

WLM ended up not using StructuredDataOnCommons in its 2019 campaign, because of various reasons (including that the structured data addition in the UploadWizard interface made the upload process too complex for newcomers). Therefore this blog post will not be written. However, other types of campaigns with structured data, for instance using the ISA tool, will be discussed in other blog posts.

It's unfortunately not yet possible to do batch uploads with tools that are non-coder friendly (i.e. Pattypan, for instance, does not support Structured Data yet). Therefore declining this task, although I will talk about batch editing StructuredDataOnCommons for GLAM files in other blog posts.

It was unfortunately not possible to run this SDC pilot project before the end of the 2017-19 StructuredDataOnCommons grant period. Reasons include unexpected wmflabs issues, see T217954: Recover ign.ign2commons.eqiad.wmflabs. I'm looking into possibilities to do a small-scale tryout of structured data descriptions to digitized maps via another way.

@Islahaddow is working on this. We are co-authoring the blog post.

The Wiki Loves Africa ISA campaign is running at this moment.

Offsite concluded, now on to next steps.

And here's a very brief report of what we discussed together during the offsite.

The offsite was held and fruitful! Currently summarizing.

We have gotten started on this!

In T234598#5575138, @Reedy wrote:

@SandraF_WMF Do you happen to remember if you got that IP address before connecting to your VPN? As it seems to belong to an Indian hosting company - https://hostroyale.com

A good point of inspiration can be this one from WMDE: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Deutschland/Data_Partnerships_Model/Roles_and_Responsibilities

The ISA tool is already well used now! See the current list of active campaigns at https://tools.wmflabs.org/isa/campaigns