@Redrose64 received a duplicate revert notification for this edit.
Reported here.
(keywords for later searching: repeat repeated double twice)
@Redrose64 received a duplicate revert notification for this edit.
Reported here.
(keywords for later searching: repeat repeated double twice)
Strange. It looks like the event was inserted twice with identical data. I wonder if there was a timeout after which insertion was retried, or something like that.
The two events are timestamped 20:29:24 and 20:29:27. The revision timestamp is 20:29:24.
*************************** 1. row *************************** event_id: NNNNNN38 event_type: reverted event_variant: NULL event_agent_id: 424023 event_agent_ip: NULL event_page_namespace: NULL event_page_title: NULL event_extra: a:5:{s:5:"revid";i:707425870;s:16:"reverted-user-id";i:9612106;s:20:"reverted-revision-id";s:9:"706986494";s:6:"method";s:4:"undo";s:7:"summary";s:199:"Undid revision 706986494 by [[Special:Contributions/Redrose64|Redrose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) See talk and the Hammersmith & City Line article. Service terminated at Whitechapel until 1941";} event_page_id: 373502 notification_event: NNNNNN38 notification_user: 9612106 notification_timestamp: 20160228202924 notification_read_timestamp: 20160228NNNNNN notification_bundle_base: 1 notification_bundle_hash: notification_bundle_display_hash: *************************** 5. row *************************** event_id: NNNNNN39 event_type: reverted event_variant: NULL event_agent_id: 424023 event_agent_ip: NULL event_page_namespace: NULL event_page_title: NULL event_extra: a:5:{s:5:"revid";i:707425870;s:16:"reverted-user-id";i:9612106;s:20:"reverted-revision-id";s:9:"706986494";s:6:"method";s:4:"undo";s:7:"summary";s:199:"Undid revision 706986494 by [[Special:Contributions/Redrose64|Redrose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) See talk and the Hammersmith & City Line article. Service terminated at Whitechapel until 1941";} event_page_id: 373502 notification_event: NNNNNN39 notification_user: 9612106 notification_timestamp: 20160228202927 notification_read_timestamp: 20160228NNNNNN notification_bundle_base: 1 notification_bundle_hash: notification_bundle_display_hash:
I can't find any evidence of DB errors in the log (I read exception.log for the minute between 2016-02-28 20:29:00 and 20:30:00). Instead, I think this might be another occurrence of the null edit bug (T123843: Making a null edit triggers a new message notification although null edit is not recorded in page history): if the reverter pressed Save twice, the second save could have been processed as a null edit.