Currently, Lato is being pulled from Google Font's server, and in Refreshed/refreshed/main.css - This should be defined instead in MediaWiki:Refreshed.css or MediaWiki:Refreshed-font (but preferrably the former)
|Resolved||MtMNC||T134669 Make Refreshed skin less specific to Brickimedia|
|Resolved||MtMNC||T142157 Make Refreshed less-specific to Brickimedia: Custom font for skin should be definable on wiki instead of the repo|
I support this. Should the default header font-family be the same as the current body scheme ("Helvetica Neue","Helvetica","Arial",sans-serif) or should it match Vector's header ("Linux Libertine",Georgia,Times,serif)?
I personally disagree with the order of the font stacking, but I'd go with a sans-serif font stack. Here's a little comparison for these based on websafe compatibility across operating systems:
- http://www.cssfontstack.com/Arial - Windows: 99.84% / Mac: 98.74%" (balanced)
- http://www.cssfontstack.com/Helvetica Windows: 7.34% / Mac: 100%" (wayyy unbalanced)
font-family: Arial, "Helvetica Neue", "Helvetica", sans-serif;
How about this one above? :D
Would it not make sense to ship the skin with a simple font-family: sans-serif and not worry about different font face compatibility across platforms? That leaves font choice entirely up to the end user which could be a good or a bad thing.