Page MenuHomePhabricator

Enable FlaggedRevs for Georgian Wikipedia
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Author: g.natela

Description:
Please enable FlaggedRevs extension for Georgian Wikipedia. We would like to have the same configuration, which have German and Polish Wikipedias, with one difference. We would like to have a special flag, called for now "FlagGiver". The users with this flag must have the ability to give review user flag, validate user flag, autoreview and "FlagGiver" user flag.

The users, who should have this flag are BRUTE, Zolokin, Nika_243, Gaeser and Floydgeo.

If this is technically impossible, please enable this extension without the special flag.

All the best,
George

P.S. The survey can be seen here -
http://ka.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E1%83%95%E1%83%98%E1%83%99%E1%83%98%E1%83%9E%E1%83%94%E1%83%93%E1%83%98%E1%83%90:%E1%83%99%E1%83%94%E1%83%9C%E1%83%AD%E1%83%98%E1%83%A1%E1%83%A7%E1%83%A0%E1%83%90/%E1%83%A1%E1%83%A2%E1%83%90%E1%83%A2%E1%83%98%E1%83%94%E1%83%91%E1%83%98%E1%83%A1_%E1%83%A8%E1%83%94%E1%83%9B%E1%83%9D%E1%83%AC%E1%83%9B%E1%83%94%E1%83%91%E1%83%90


Version: unspecified
Severity: normal
URL: ka.wikipedia.org

Details

Reference
bz24976

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Lowest.
bzimport set Reference to bz24976.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

g.natela wrote:

P.P.S. Maybe this information is required - the namespaces, where it must be enabled are article and files. Other namespaces are not necessary.

And who gives out FlagGiver user flag?

Should bureucrats be able to add and remove it?

g.natela wrote:

Of course. As I mentioned above, the users mentioned there might have this flag from it's creation (But of course if it's not possible лет Bureaucrats have this right anyway).

Thanks

hashar added a comment.Nov 6 2010, 2:31 PM

Changed summary, lowering severity

demon added a comment.Jan 15 2011, 5:45 PM
  • Bug 26748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

george wrote:

Is anyone alive here?

Reopening, See no reason to RSOLVE/LATER it.

  • Bug 27805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
aaron added a comment.Mar 25 2011, 1:05 AM

(In reply to comment #1)

P.P.S. Maybe this information is required - the namespaces, where it must be
enabled are article and files. Other namespaces are not necessary.

Not templates? Dewiki has templates reviewable.

(In reply to comment #0)

We would like to have a special flag, called for now "FlagGiver".
The users with this flag must have the ability to give review user flag,
validate user flag, autoreview and "FlagGiver" user flag.

If this is like dewiki, then there is only one review level, thus there is no use for 'validate'. Groups can be granted, but not rights directly. The 'review' flag could be granted by putting a user in the 'editor' group. A 'trusted' group could be created, so that 'autoreview' could be granted by putting a user in the group.

It would be much simpler to let Admins grant these things, and not have a FlagGiver group.

g.natela wrote:

Hello, I've asked the users of ka wiki. We consider all recommendations by Aaron Schulz correct. We consider, that FlagGiver group is necessary no more. So please, maybe it is possible to enable it sooner?

aaron added a comment.Apr 11 2011, 2:52 AM

(In reply to comment #10)

Hello, I've asked the users of ka wiki. We consider all recommendations by
Aaron Schulz correct. We consider, that FlagGiver group is necessary no more.
So please, maybe it is possible to enable it sooner?

I forgot to mention dewiki has Categories description pages reviewable too. Should that be the case here?

Also, I assume you don't want $wgFlaggedRevsAutopromote or $wgFlaggedRevsAutoconfirm promotion of users into FlaggedRevs groups. The wiki is a bit too small for those things, unlike dewiki.

g.natela wrote:

Yeas, let categories be reviewable, if it's not too difficult. Autopromotion is not necessary, of course. Thank you!

aaron added a comment.Apr 11 2011, 4:41 AM

Should be done now.

g.natela wrote:

Hello!

Thank you very much, everything works correctly, just as it should. Thank you again!