This just needs a script ran to refresh the statistics.

Model details for ms6 is: Sun Fire X4540 (from: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Obsolete:Ms6)

Depending on your ISP, it could be some anti-spam/abuse features T168142: Cleanup phabricator.wikimedia.org uploaded files, WP zero abuse

@ArielGlenn may know, this is from a quick scan of SAL

If we are going to use fake namespaces, why are we removing the real namespace?

See also T157260: Investigation: Replace the Education Program Extension with CollaborationKit

The task for the DBAs to do their side of things for replication got stalled and looks like they never got repinged.

Flow shouldn't be treated any different to any other page in this regard.

Added WMF-Legal for their input. Privacy Policies etc.

T120752: decommission dickson is the decom task for the old server

I will admit, I get hit by this but using esc and clicking anywhere off the picture does close it now (didn't previously iirc), Although I wonder if its a bit of mental training type thing because I normally except light-boxes to be black.

This should be reported upstream, It is a valid idea that would link well to their push for anti-spam work they were doing not too long ago.

T168142: Cleanup phabricator.wikimedia.org uploaded files, WP zero abuse

I had a very quick and brief look but can't find it, But i believe previous consensus /or desire was not to add more subdomains on the wikipedia domain unless they are actually wikipedia projects, or have a good use-case to be there, or a regression from removal (due to previously advertised urls).

In T165540#3336855, @Huji wrote:

If we are to keep these files, can we at least rename them to COC (with no extension)

In T165540#3336658, @Ladsgroup wrote:

…snip…
I tried to use gerrit but then I realized it's 900 extension repos and that can't be done using gerrit so I asked for a temporary push access and pushed to all.

In T165540#3331368, @Nikerabbit wrote:

I noticed that the addition of CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md was reverted in some repositories. Is it allowed to do that while continuing to use Wikimedia's Gerrit? The removal of that file does not mean that the policy wouldn't apply, right?

NDA confirmed by @RobH T167116#3319698

Reopening, we can just re-scope this task

Isn't every blog post a periodic update?

Also need to re-add the blog widget back default front page: T163067: Remove "Latest Posts" widget on phabricator.wikimedia.org homepage (as its last posting was a year ago)

I thought our goal was not to have .md files and etc in our repos (phase3/core) because we use plain extensionless files for these type of things?

I just attempted and it worked fine.

In T162996#3260603, @zhuyifei1999 wrote:

In T162996#3260256, @Peachey88 wrote:

As for the original question: Shouldn't we be blocking the creation of the account during the OAuth process? compared to do hacky other methods?

FWIW, a blocked user was not able to use OAuth till T156803: Handle blocked users consistently. What we could do is check the blocked field of JWT (I don't remember what that is)

There is nothing being requested in this task.

As for the original question: Shouldn't we be blocking the creation of the account during the OAuth process? compared to do hacky other methods?

I would recommend using IRC-group-contacts for the name, that is the common name for this team, I have never heard them refered to the suggested names by @Danilo