@Qgil Doesn't need Operations tbh, just needs someone to deploy and run the scripts and that can preferably access officewiki at the same time to check that it went right (Personally I would suggest pinging @Reedy on IRC). Prior history from memory is that we are pretty loose when it comes to consensus for deploying to officewiki anyway.

Yes, that would be best done by Office-IT as a shared mailbox, @egalvezwmf you will need to submit this as a request in zendesk.

In T175393#3598491, @bd808 wrote:

Will there be some secret decoder ring to tell me which of the 3 to post which message to?

In theory yes, But personally i wouldn't both because because it will just cause noise for people that receive emails/irc etc (especially if you do these on bulk).

This was a dup that got pointed out to me, forgot to close off.

The file hasn't been touched since 2011 (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/File:Hesaidsemanticga2.jpg#filehistory) but i'm fairly certain it has worked since then.

This could/would cause privacy issues, Could use it to confirm other users email address when they aren't public via MediaWiki.

This just needs a script ran to refresh the statistics.

Model details for ms6 is: Sun Fire X4540 (from: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Obsolete:Ms6)

Depending on your ISP, it could be some anti-spam/abuse features T168142: Cleanup phabricator.wikimedia.org uploaded files, WP zero abuse

@ArielGlenn may know, this is from a quick scan of SAL

If we are going to use fake namespaces, why are we removing the real namespace?

See also T157260: Investigation: Replace the Education Program Extension with CollaborationKit

The task for the DBAs to do their side of things for replication got stalled and looks like they never got repinged.

Flow shouldn't be treated any different to any other page in this regard.

Added WMF-Legal for their input. Privacy Policies etc.

T120752: decommission dickson is the decom task for the old server

I will admit, I get hit by this but using esc and clicking anywhere off the picture does close it now (didn't previously iirc), Although I wonder if its a bit of mental training type thing because I normally except light-boxes to be black.

This should be reported upstream, It is a valid idea that would link well to their push for anti-spam work they were doing not too long ago.

T168142: Cleanup phabricator.wikimedia.org uploaded files, WP zero abuse

I had a very quick and brief look but can't find it, But i believe previous consensus /or desire was not to add more subdomains on the wikipedia domain unless they are actually wikipedia projects, or have a good use-case to be there, or a regression from removal (due to previously advertised urls).

In T165540#3336855, @Huji wrote:

If we are to keep these files, can we at least rename them to COC (with no extension)

In T165540#3336658, @Ladsgroup wrote:

…snip…
I tried to use gerrit but then I realized it's 900 extension repos and that can't be done using gerrit so I asked for a temporary push access and pushed to all.

In T165540#3331368, @Nikerabbit wrote:

I noticed that the addition of CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md was reverted in some repositories. Is it allowed to do that while continuing to use Wikimedia's Gerrit? The removal of that file does not mean that the policy wouldn't apply, right?

NDA confirmed by @RobH T167116#3319698