If http://juliuszgonera.com/wddh/ is intended to be THE prototype, then this task is basically completed. If not, then please explain and setup the actual prototype in order to work on it.
Description
Details
- Reference
- fl482
Title | Reference | Author | Source Branch | Dest Branch | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Do not offer Project Tags to be added to Subscribers fields | repos/phabricator/phabricator!9 | aklapper | T303829 | wmf/stable |
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolved | • Spage | T307 Announcing the Developer Hub prototype release | |||
Resolved | • Spage | T299 Release the Developer Hub prototype | |||
Declined | Qgil | T303 Setup the Developer Hub prototype |
Event Timeline
qgil wrote on 2014-07-22 13:47:56 (UTC)
I wonder whether we should require to have the prototype hosted in Labs. Better than a personal host, isn't it? No strong opinion, though.
jgonera wrote on 2014-07-22 22:41:15 (UTC)
It's hosted using GitHub pages now. No strong feelings about it though. I think we agreed on adding some real content to the prototype to call it finished.
qgil wrote on 2014-08-25 12:25:38 (UTC)
@MSyed says: "I've forked Juliusz's repo on github and will be committing code here: https://github.com/moizsyed/build.wikimedia.org "
According to T312, the hub is going to be a namespace in mediawiki.org with an own skin. In this case, the prototype... could be the real thing just in an official Work In Progress, right?
I don't see the point of sttarting some Labs instance when we can use mediawiki.org directly. Thoughts?
@Spage is focusing on prototyping through the creation of actual content in mediawiki.org, under the API: namespace. From there we can decide what's next. In any case, prototyping using an external tool is currently out of scope. Therefore, I'm declining this task.