Next steps
Per 13 November meeting with @VPuffetMichel and @RLazarus, next step is for me to review the content of https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/SLO/EditCheck and document any questions/edits/etc. I think are important to address before "signing off" on this agreement in my capacity as Editing Team product manager.

Notes to self:

• Ensure description of Edit Check is accurate exhaustive
• Confirm performance/availability targets align with expectations

For reference: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/SLO/template_instructions.

In T364507#10319043, @ppelberg wrote:

Next steps
Per 13 November meeting with @VPuffetMichel and @RLazarus, next step is for me to review the content of https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/SLO/EditCheck and document any questions/edits/etc. I think are important to address before "signing off" on this agreement in my capacity as Editing Team product manager.

Notes to self:

• Ensure description of Edit Check is accurate exhaustive
• Confirm performance/availability targets align with expectations

For reference: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/SLO/template_instructions.

Having published these changes to the SLO and confirming @RLazarus agrees with them, I think we can consider this iteration of the SLO complete from the perspective of product.

Per what Reuven and I discussed offline, we'll iterate on this SLO if/when Edit Check changes in ways that warrant us doing so. E.g. When Edit Check begins to depend on external services which we're planning to have happen via T379397.