The advanced search among tasks is not advanced at all. Compare http://fab.wmflabs.org/maniphest/query/advanced/ to https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/query.cgi?format=advanced (including custom query)
Description
Description
Details
Details
- Reference
- fl117
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | Qgil | T553 Engineering Community team goals for October 2014 | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T174 Launch Wikimedia Phabricator Day 1 | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T175 Nominate a team in charge of deploying and maintaining Wikimedia Phabricator code | |||
| Resolved | • RobLa-WMF | T17 Allocate resources for the migration and maintenance | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T19 Define which features existing in our current tools are really missing in Phabricator | |||
| Resolved | Qgil | T15 Migrate Bugzilla to Phabricator | |||
| Resolved | Aklapper | T22 Identify features Bugzilla users would miss in Phabricator | |||
| Invalid | Qgil | T59 Advanced search is not advanced |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
qgil wrote on 2014-04-18 03:52:02 (UTC)
It actually looks advanced enough for the types of searches I do, and I'm in the kind-of-advanced user segment. Can you provide examples of searches that you would perform in Bugzilla but cannot perform here?
What specific features could we request upstream?
Comment Actions
qgil wrote on 2014-04-22 06:05:40 (UTC)
Without more information or more opinions I can't create any meaningful task upstream.
Comment Actions
aklapper wrote on 2014-04-23 08:09:02 (UTC)
I had the same feeling initially until chatting with upstream devs to realize that I might need to question my criteria for queries instead and if they are really the only way to find out something specific (e.g. forgotten reports in this case).
Nemo: Which *exact* queries are you missing? This needs specific, defined examples about functionality and its usecases...
Comment Actions
qgil wrote on 2014-04-27 03:08:11 (UTC)
Closing. Please reopen if you have a specific example.