|Resolved||Qgil||T553 Engineering Community team goals for October 2014|
|Resolved||Qgil||T174 Launch Wikimedia Phabricator Day 1|
|Resolved||Qgil||T175 Nominate a team in charge of deploying and maintaining Wikimedia Phabricator code|
|Resolved||• RobLa-WMF||T17 Allocate resources for the migration and maintenance|
|Resolved||Qgil||T19 Define which features existing in our current tools are really missing in Phabricator|
|Resolved||Qgil||T15 Migrate Bugzilla to Phabricator|
|Resolved||Aklapper||T22 Identify features Bugzilla users would miss in Phabricator|
|Invalid||Qgil||T59 Advanced search is not advanced|
qgil wrote on 2014-04-18 03:52:02 (UTC)
It actually looks advanced enough for the types of searches I do, and I'm in the kind-of-advanced user segment. Can you provide examples of searches that you would perform in Bugzilla but cannot perform here?
What specific features could we request upstream?
aklapper wrote on 2014-04-23 08:09:02 (UTC)
I had the same feeling initially until chatting with upstream devs to realize that I might need to question my criteria for queries instead and if they are really the only way to find out something specific (e.g. forgotten reports in this case).
Nemo: Which *exact* queries are you missing? This needs specific, defined examples about functionality and its usecases...