@Qgil, @Aklapper, Sorry guys, just seeing these.

@Jbarbara could you take a look.

@DarTar just saw this, thank you for the input! Looks great!

@DarTar @Aklapper Here's a first pass at a survey to be conducted by Partnerships with known Wikipedia content users. What other questions should be added to help us understand how they currently use our content and what type of value/functionality we should consider adding as we improve our projects? Trying to keep it under 12 questions. Thank you!!
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JZVR29iX1ZIvSSKt415dlnCVCpD6MZrqIaVpMjrwPq4/edit?ts=560acfd9

@DarTar I looked at your survey, where can I find the results?

Not sure.

@DarTar thanks for putting this in the Q

@Qgil, you're right, different groups will have different KPI lenses - we're meeting this afternoon to discuss ours.

@Qgil there is no disagreement here. "I'd rather focus on obtaining useful metrics of our web APIs" Could you list what these useful metrics are?

Thanks @Krenair !

Follow up questions to this group:

@DarTar, that is interesting....trying to wrap my head around this and making sense of this info to inform future API strategy.

@Spage, thanks for adding @Ironholds.
APIs use: We have a really big need to find out the WHO, HOW, WHAT, WHERE and WHEN?

Ditto! Thank you to everyone working on this.

"Mediating" changed to "Facilitating". That is what was meant. Thanks for catching that.

@Qgil We have a short list of topics we can work with for the pilot project with the World Bank.
If there are additional requests on this pilot, I'll post them to the World Bank project page on Wiki Loves Open Data/WorldBank.

@Qgil working on it -- still waiting confirmation from World Bank that is is okay to add a page with their contact info - that would make it official and they/we might need to check in with comms on proper process.

thanks for the link @Tbayer. this time around we are working with World Bank's data scientists (as opposed to Program Leads like in the 2006 pilot). They might be looking at slightly different data points. Will share updates as they come in.

@ezachte, good to meet you here, would you have time for a quick call/google hangout tomorrow or Thursday? I can explain what we are looking for. Thanks!
@DarTar, thanks for connecting!

@Tbayer, @DarTar thank you!

@Quiddity thank you! This is helpful.

Hello @Vibhabamba, hello all, could someone give a quick status update on TwitterCards? including current status, bottlenecks, etc (to a non-techie-person-like-me) Thank you! Very much appreciated!

Hi all, I realize re-reading my request above that is sounds like the Strategic Partnerships team is sole responsible for driving these new cool opportunities -- I want to clarify that we/Partnerships are a very small portion of this and that I have been relying heavily on the Engineering Community's support and expertise, without which these conversations would never be possible, and also on Wikidata's team who've been super supportive from the beginning. Credit should be given were credit is due. Thank you EC, Wikidata and everyone on here for your support in exploring these new areas.

Jane023 - Great to read about Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings - wonderful project!

@Wittylama - This is very exciting to read, Europeana is a perfect fit. It's not always obvious to organizations I've spoken with that these partnerships are a two-way benefit, they feed in and can pull from the projects. I'd love to learn more about the Europeana project, that would inform my conversations with other orgs.

@Qgil : ok, let's do that . I was told (can't recall by who) that I should open a project of Fabricator to start 'capturing' some of the tasks around this project. The project is: World Bank Content Integration

@Aklapper, sorry for the delayed reply, just seeing your comment now.
There is a Wiki page on Meta that was put up for the Intro of Kourosh https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Partnerships_FAQ
How public should that tasks be? As long as we are not disclosing details on legal terms or agreements and third party personal information (which we will not) I think anything else is open. Again, I will defer to Quim to set the parameter for the use of this area.

@RobH thank you for the help on this! Appreciated!