Some communities prefer to use Facebook instead of classical wikitext discussion pages.
If the interface is a blocker, these communities may consider to use Flow.
Description
Description
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Declined | Trizek-WMF | T130712 Propose to a community which uses Facebook as a community hub to try Flow | |||
| Declined | None | T130711 Identify a community which uses Facebook as a community hub and understand why | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T137796 Help to define next steps concerning Flow development, based on the Flow Satisfaction Survey | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T125632 Plan, write and submit a satisfaction survey concerning Flow to communities | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T130730 Draft and review a public announcement concerning Flow support | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T141758 Improve the "Why not VE?" section of the Flow FAQ | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T144547 Create a distribution list for Flow satisfaction survey and distribute it | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T144730 Publication of the Flow Satisfaction Survey results including an analysis and raw data | |||
| Resolved | Trizek-WMF | T145198 Flow satisfaction survey result: translate free forms |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
For what is worth:
We’ve created a Google group to stay connected, help each other, and ensure that the participation of the students does not stop after the event.
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/04/07/first-wikimedia-hackathon-roorkee/
Comment Actions
I think first we should complete T137796: Help to define next steps concerning Flow development, based on the Flow Satisfaction Survey, then come back to this task and check what we want to do with it.
Comment Actions
I don't know if that task is on the Community-Relations-Support scope. How users interact and how communities are building themselves is not really related to CL work.