I'm one of the Community Relations Specialists. I talk with readers, editors, volunteer developers and staff so that they can know each other, know what they do, what they expect and what they hope for. I mostly work with the Growth team around new features that help newcomers to successfully become editors.
I'm also working on documentation and easing translations or anything else that requires my support. See my assigned tasks.
We will just focus on T345298: Identify participating wikis for Edit Check (references) A/B test, but provide the feature by default for smaller wikis if they request it.
Thank you!
I also uploaded a new version of the report to https://people.wikimedia.org/~urbanecm/growth-team/T352174_flow_per_day_per_page_20231206.html. Please let me know if you want it to be updated periodically.
It already gives a good overview. I will ping you if needed.
Thank you Martin!
(edit conflict)
Enabling EC(R) as a default feature at some wikis, while we look for candidates to run the A/B may not be the most efficient strategy. To be discussed with the team, but I'm suggesting abandoning this task and switching to T345298: Identify participating wikis for Edit Check (references) A/B test.
I just sent a message to Catalan Wikipedia, in the context of T346108: [EPIC] IP Masking: StructuredDiscussions (Flow)/LiquidThreads Community discussion.
The amount of work is way higher than I expected, hence the change.
I'll consider breaking it into subtasks, but for that, I need to review the calendar for the whole project.
We have to make proper community engagement, which is not doable at the moment as I'm working on T346108: [EPIC] IP Masking: StructuredDiscussions (Flow)/LiquidThreads Community discussion.
Indeed, I tested it in French before filing the task. The message remains unclear even with the default message, as it does not give a way to fix the problem.
Should we duplicate the feedback link, as in option C? I would keep the CTA at the top of the page.
@Zapipedia-WMF, the task is not reflecting the status of the task: Ambassador feedback was still expected. Thank you for sharing your thoughts!
The question was raised at de.wp.
Yes, the message I suggest is for the one-off reassignment. Based on the feedback received, it would say "Mass reassignment of mentees since $oldmentor is no longer an active mentor" for clarity (tweaked based on Soda's feedback below).
For the script, the idea is to clearly convey that it is an automated process.
It would say "Automated reassignment of mentees since $oldmentor is no longer an active mentor"
And (IIRC) when this code will be backported, activation is a config change, which is not impacted by the absence of train.
Some further reading, related to this task:
In the context of T346108: [EPIC] IP Masking: StructuredDiscussions (Flow)/LiquidThreads Community discussion, we need to revive this task.
Agreed!
The acceptance criteria listed in this task will be covered in the upcoming tasks for each session.
The script was stopped as apparently indefinite blocked users are getting a mentor.