| daniel | |
| Jun 6 2017, 2:13 PM |
| F8391208: image.png | |
| Jun 6 2017, 4:10 PM |
| F8391199: image.png | |
| Jun 6 2017, 4:10 PM |
Provide a rough overview of the performance impact of using vue.js. There are two relevant parts to this:
No comprehensive measurements are needed at this point, just some ballpark figures, and some information on how this compares to other frameworks.
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | Lydia_Pintscher | T167134 Blockers for using the vue.js framework for Wikibase on the Wikimedia cluster | |||
| Resolved | Jan_Dittrich | T167139 Preliminary performance evaluation of vue.js |
@Jan_Dittrich Ah, thank you! In that document, there is also a size comparison:
Preact
8,112 preact.min.js
4,570 preact-router.js
6,999 redux.min.js
Total: 19K
Vue
23,189 vue-router.min.js
56,492 vue.runtime.min.js
10,509 vuex.min.js
Total: 90K
Thanks. What also applies aside of pure size/performance is sustainability of the project. While Preact is impressive, I don't know how it is backed and in particular, how they plan to keep up (or not) with react’s API changes.
@Jan_Dittrich does this ticket refer to the JS bit of vue JS only?
If so, can we close this as done?
