Page MenuHomePhabricator

Applying pending changes protection and extended confirmed users in idwiki
Closed, DeclinedPublic


There is a consensus there to change the FlaggedRevs system to Pending changes and extended confirmed users like I hope the user with editor rights will be changed to reviewer rights like

Event Timeline

Restricted Application added a subscriber: Aklapper. · View Herald TranscriptAug 8 2017, 11:02 PM
Arifin.wijaya triaged this task as High priority.Aug 8 2017, 11:15 PM
Kenrick95 added a subscriber: Kenrick95.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Dereckson. · View Herald TranscriptAug 11 2017, 1:08 PM
MarcoAurelio lowered the priority of this task from High to Low.Aug 13 2017, 7:06 PM
MarcoAurelio added a subscriber: MarcoAurelio.

Are you sure? Enwiki is fairly big and really needs such thing. I do oppose doing the deploy for your wiki.

Arifin.wijaya added a comment.EditedAug 14 2017, 12:54 AM

User in support to change the FlaggedRevs system to pending changes system because of massive vandalism and many biography and television article in is in vandalism. So I hope to change that system to the pending changes system because vandalism is happened to Many users in support to change that system so there are consensus in You can see in that proposal. Ratio total admin and total article in are small: 35:407.813. There are the consensus in that proposal.

Vandalism is increasingly rampant in the (especially articles related to football, television, soap operas, and railways), lack of user with editor rights are active in handling vandalism, because some users who volunteered as editors simply because they want to carry that status only, also the traffic on is quite high as in other large Wikipedia. So I hope to change the FlaggedRevs system into pending changes system. I think the FlaggedRevs system is more suitable to be applied on a small wiki like, id.wiktionary,, etc.

Urbanecm closed this task as Declined.Aug 14 2017, 1:14 AM

No, this thing is getting to far imho. See discussion at Z398 too.

Well, I reopen the proposal in to see what wrong to that proposal because I think this thing is related to the topic.