| Cirdan | |
| May 11 2018, 8:03 AM |
| F22722800: grafik.png | |
| Jun 27 2018, 11:50 AM |
| F22722831: grafik.png | |
| Jun 27 2018, 11:50 AM |
| F22455749: grafik.png | |
| Jun 21 2018, 4:49 PM |
When trying to label edits for dewiki through the labeling gadget, for all edits I see revision not found. The error message shown is "Die Metadaten für die Version 146082568 konnten nicht abgerufen werden. Durch das Klicken auf die Schaltfläche „Überspringen“ kann diese Aufgabe übersprungen werden."
From the stats page I can see that the campaign is really old, so perhaps the data set needs to be updated/re-drawn?
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | None | T130213 [Epic] Edit quality models (damaging/goodfaith) | |||
| Resolved | Ladsgroup | T130257 Deploy edit quality models for dewiki | |||
| Resolved | None | T129700 Complete dewiki edit quality campaign | |||
| Open | None | T194457 Can't label edits in private browsing |
Can you try again. I just tried and works just fine for me. For any edit that is not found, please skip the edit.
No, it still doesn't work for me... I just went through a batch of 50 revisions and not a single one could be retrieved... For example, it claims revision 138310021 was not found, which as one can see from the link is still available.
This is the message I get:
That is indeed definitely a problem I can't reproduce. My guess is something wrong with your CORS settings, Can you get me a screenshot of the console log (also can you tell me what is your browser?)
I tried to access the campaign using Chrome (Private window) and it works fine.
With Firefox, I now see the following error message when trying to access http://labels.wmflabs.org/ui/dewiki/ in a private window:
In case you are interested, this is the output in the console:
Without using a private window, it works fine. Previously, I have always used a private window, hence I don't know whether it was really a problem or it is an issue with the incognito mode in Firefox.
Aha, You should not do that. It needs session storage which is not accessible by design in private browsing.