We are looking into adding these in the future. However, before we do so, there needs to be more consistency across team/department pages - including each one having one - otherwise it sets up confusing expectations for the end-user when some have it but others do not and what you find on those pages varies dramatically. The On-wiki documentation working group will be looking at this in the future

In T200811#4465644, @Varnent wrote:

We are looking into adding these in the future. However, before we do so, there needs to be more consistency across team/department pages - including each one having one - otherwise it sets up confusing expectations for the end-user when some have it but others do not and what you find on those pages varies dramatically. The On-wiki documentation working group will be looking at this in the future

@Varnent: Happy to hear that! Where can I follow such a task of the On-wiki_documentation_working_group and potentially provide input? (T115853: Every WMF engineering team should have a "Contact" section on its public wiki page feels slightly related.)

@Aklapper - The Meta-Wiki page is the best place for info on that group's activities as they evolve. For now, the focus is on completing the transition from the old website - so this task is likely months away. Our on-wiki documentation effort is ongoing (vs. a short-term project) - so there is no set end-date for these activities.

Relatedly, T201636: The staff page does not show teams/sub-teams anymore which makes it considerably less useful means that the "teams" as advertised by the new staff page (particularly under Audiences) aren't necessarily entities for which it makes sense to have a team page. Most of the Audiences sub-teams that are no longer listed separately on the staff page do have team pages, and most of the teams that are listed don't.