Where possible (when the edit only affects one gloss), add language codes to edit summaries regarding glosses.
In other words,
/* add-sense:1||L3-S2 */ the second sense
needs to become
/* add-sense:1|en|L3-S2 */ the second sense
Note: some other message already include the language code, apparently, so I’m not sure how many messages remain that don’t have it.
| Subject | Repo | Branch | Lines +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set language in ChangeOpSenseAdd if possible | mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLexeme | master | +26 -2 |
| Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | Lydia_Pintscher | T196288 Review Edits | |||
| Resolved | hoo | T196290 See summary of edit including Senses | |||
| Resolved | Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE | T200817 Add language codes to sense edit summaries |
I think that might actually be the only such message, because it’s a special case – all the other messages (editing a sense instead of adding a new one) start out from minor ChangeOps, which each have their own language code, and the language code is only erased if necessary by the SummaryAggregator.
Change 449502 had a related patch set uploaded (by Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE); owner: Lucas Werkmeister (WMDE)):
[mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLexeme@master] Set language in ChangeOpSenseAdd if possible
Change 449502 merged by jenkins-bot:
[mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseLexeme@master] Set language in ChangeOpSenseAdd if possible
@Lydia_Pintscher, you should be able to test this by creating a new sense with one gloss on beta wikidata and checking that the edit summary mentions the language.