Rollbacks (mw-rollback) are always automatically marked as patrolled. (AFAIK) Even if the user in question isn't autopatrolled.
Two suggestions (which don't rule each other out):
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Forum#Why_does_global_rollback_include_autopatrol%3F
For the first suggestion, there might be a concern that an undo can contain new content. If this is the case, you could:
Can I comment that this is one user generating this discussion, and at this time it is an unsupported issue. The rights as currently set have been in place for 12 years, and were what would have been considered a consensus at that time. There is no demonstrated issue or community reports of this required change.
Setting the status back to stalled as that is the status that DannyS712 has assigned. Note that @94rain and North8000 replied in the thread on meta and appear to be in favor of this idea. Also, there is no need for consensus to implement this as a feature. Consensus would only be required to add the new right to any user group. It is true though that developer time is slightly more likely to be freed for a feature for which there is already consensus to enable it somewhere. This is a chicken-and-egg problem though, it would be difficult to garner support for using a feature that doesn't exist yet.
As @AlexisJazz said this is a feature request. Now MediaWiki software developer have to think about it.
Treating this as a software development request, hence removing tag and resetting status.