@Aklapper Per reports of the affected users, the problem has been resolved this week, which means somebody fixed it (by accident?).

@MusikAnimal Furthermore, links on Automated Edits are broken/wrong as well. For example, two links of three tools (undo and redirect) are broken on my stats (pointing to non-existing pages). Maybe we should use Meta pages instead of trying to find the local ones?

In T186653#4631172, @Niharika wrote:

In T186653#4622937, @Bencemac wrote:

@Niharika Do you have plan for beta (e.g. which wikis will participate)?

@Bencemac The wizard is ready and I asked users on the project talk page if there's interest in being early adopters. I didn't get much of a response so I have created T205290: Convert TemplateWizard into a beta feature instead. It will go out on all wikis as a beta feature and then be eventually converted to a regular tool on all wikis. Does that seem like a good idea?

@Niharika Do you have plan for beta (e.g. which wikis will participate)?

In T205180#4613713, @Aklapper wrote:

Does the problem also happen when using safemode=1 on Special:Watchlist?
If it does, please provide any non-default settings on https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciális:Beállításaim#mw-prefsection-watchlist to reproduce.

In T205180#4607856, @Aklapper wrote:

Can Misibacsi please try again with safemode=1? This allows you to test if a problem is because of your user scripts or personal gadgets without uninstalling them. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Locating_broken_scripts for more information.

@Ascilto You can do it here (I did it myself).

Editing a section of a huge page and saving the changes are very slow as well; you can try it on these pages.

Templates were fixed today, we are waiting for v2.0beta10.

In T197541#4564828, @Catrope wrote:

because NULL != 90 is false (that sounds strange, but any comparison involving null is false).

One more.

@alanajjar Please take a look.

@srishakatux Isn't this solved by DuplicateReferences gadget?

Yes, but these are because of our Labdarúgó-mérkőzés template, so IABot did not make any mistake. In summary, I cannot reproduce the problem either.

Sorry about that. Please watch this video. In my opinion, the software should format the second link (below text) like this
[[wikidata:User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted]]

@Esanders Yes, it is correct. My problem is that simply inserting the link does not work like this. For example:

Not? In my opinion, internal links are nicer, shorter and indicate that better they are linking to a Wikimedia-related project (Wikidata, Commons, Phabricator, etc.)

Maybe these Wikidata items can help: AfD, RfD and RfPP.

I forgot to mention, but this was not the first time; I got likely and very likely before.

You are right, sorry for the false alarm. My bad.

Hmm, today IABot deleted them.

@matej_suchanek Hey! Can I ask that what's up with this task?

@Rjwilmsi I forgot to mention, but we use the same format for RFC links, see the configuration. Could you fix this too?

@Cirdan I did it before and this happened: any idea?

Furthermore, archives are available (e.g. from 2013)

@Cyberpower678 In the name of the Hungarian community, I would like to thank your effort and patient. We are very thankful. Keep it up!

In T199658#4427399, @KartikMistry wrote:

In T199658#4427202, @Bencemac wrote:

I am just curious: circa how many free space will we get?

Very less at this point, but advantage of this script run is: It will free those articles and make them available for translation for other users.

I am just curious: circa how many free space will we get?

It looks like everything is fine. Two little thing:

In T184856#4426166, @Cyberpower678 wrote:

50 edits finished

Just a wild idea; would it be possible that the bot fixes first only those dead links which are inside a template? As far I see, it works perfectly (after solving the date format problem).

In T184856#4426095, @Cyberpower678 wrote:

In T184856#4425713, @Bencemac wrote:

• [Link Text] links sometimes lose their end (1)

• ??? I'm not sure I understand what you mean?

In T184856#4426079, @Cyberpower678 wrote:

Are all months supposed to be in lowercase?

Date parameter of {{Dead link}} – {{Halott link}} should formated the following:

Some bug:

Request for flag.

Exactly.

Currently, I am in a big bot work (~21k pages). You can find (empty) examples on the Hungarian bot request page, but here is a current one: https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=5105218

@Reedy My bad, I fixed the number. Would not be possible that we increase the limit only if a Wikipedia is chosen? Or are there any other options?

@Cyberpower678 I was planning that I manually check some edits of the bot (~50) and if everything is OK, then the bot would get trusted user right for e.g. 2 weeks. The main difference between a bot and trusted user is that trusted users' edits appear on everybody's watchlist: it would be enough time for us to find any problem.

Today, I accidentally pressed (or tapped?) the thanks button while I was reading a problematic edit. Its author was banned because of that edit; I think you can understand that I am not proud at all. We should do something.

Hmm, but it happened. I published the article and I made some changes. After that, I wanted to start a new translation, but it was not published (it appeared as a current translation). After I deleted, it disappeared (went to my finished translation).

@Amire80 That is strange, because when it happened with me, I was the only one who edited the page after creating. Does it mean "somebody" could mean myself too?

Whoa, I was the test subject for Wikidata? So cool! :) Anyway, thanks for your work!

@Pginer-WMF I think that {{Template name}} format without any parameter would be fine and we should not complicate it. Parameters (for x minutes, from till, etc.) are not necessary, a simple template would be enough. I think most of time the template would be removed in 24 hours (probably by the original user).

Something similar: T184323.

Is there anything else we should perform?

In use and Under construction has 86+62 sitelinks. I would say that that's enough for covering the most used languages.

@Nikerabbit Of course that would help, but personally, I don't like increasing my edit counter unnecessarily. :) The biggest problem with this is that beginners don't know the template, so they cannot add it.

@Urbanecm It doesn't help. It affects every editor, no matter they are using the old or the new watchlist.

List of cities and towns in Armenia is a perfect example of the problem. It doesn't matter which option (use or don't) do you choose, the whole translation page crashes and impossible to edit anything.

@Amire80 After publishing, should not be marked as published?

@MusikAnimal Thanks for you constant great work!

Furthermore, would it be possible the bot converts [URL text] dead links into {{cite web|url=URL|title=text|accessdate=YYYY-MM-DD|archiveurl=|archivedate=}} format?

@Cyberpower678 First of all, I am answering your questions. I am bureaucrat on the Hungarian Wikipedia, so I can grant the bot flag. However, I would like to do the following; without bot flag, IABot should make ~50 edits (or more, if it is necessary) and I would check them one by one.

I think an option on the hamburger menu (three horizontal lines) would be the easiest way for changing the default setting.

I know that HTTPS is available, because I spotted a "use security connection" option on the login page. However, I am using HTTPS Everywhere but it doesn't recognise it; the only option is typing the htts:// URL.

@DLynch What does this mean: can I hope positive outcome? I think adding a setting should be high priority. Without it, pasting texts is pain even tough I find this function really useful. About escaping, it is a little bit strange; plain text is the default, but it inserting as wikitext?

In this case, @Samat and @Tgr will know what to do.

I've found that if I don't want to insert a text (and press Esc) the software inserts it anyway as wikitext. It can cause that user doesn't notice it and saves with undesired texts.

@matmarex Windows 10, Firefox 60.0.1: OK.

Shall I create a list about the affected templates and their parameters?

Done as well, sorry for the delay.

No, I do not know about it. Could you link me a manual? I cannot find myself.

@Cyberpower678 Could you give us a quick status report (as usual, when is the question)? Thanks!

@Urbanecm Done.