In T415308#11549188, @Ladsgroup wrote:

The reduction in update frequency is actually intentional: T323495 if some system is built to clean up the old data. We can increase the frequency again. It shouldn't be too hard but FR‌ is unowned

Thank you very much!

Thanks @Samwilson! I think switching to a central dialog could be a solution but let's see if T364664 changes anything. I will check with the huwiki community after it is deployed and report back.

Thank you @Ladsgroup!

Hi @sjvipin, do we have any update on this?

Thank you Aklapper! Sent it a few minutes ago.

Thanks, I was not aware about that it works now automatically.

It works, thank you @JJMC89!

In case of falsely detected URLs the correct way to resolve the problem is fixing the URL via the interface linked on the bot's user page, not blocking the bot on any page. I would do that myself, but I do not have the authority, thus we need help. After it is done, the bot should and can be unblocked.

That would be perfect!

Many thanks @MusikAnimal!

Under deprecated I meant not preferred alias, as we need to choose one parameter pair for the bot (personally, I don't have a favourite).

@Cyberpower678: these two edits were made after or before the requested changes? Just because they still added duplicated parameters.

The patch has deployed, I'll notify the community.

FYI: the community vote has just ended, the result is reverting T121995 and going back to the original setting.

In T263363#6484715, @Dbrant wrote:

@Bencemac You are correct that this number actually indicates your total number of edits (not just Suggested Edits), and the tooltip string should be updated. (In fact, for the moment the number is your total contributions across Wikidata and Commons, not Wikipedia, for complicated reasons. But this will be refined and updated in the future.)

I am, however, unable to reproduce the issue of your edits not loading at all. Does it still happen now?

It's back. (temporary problem?)

The test period ended 17+ month ago, can somebody please revert it as the community wants?

@Harej I am not sure, the task is not fully resolved.

Only desktop, I believe.

In T237282#5976508, @Nuria wrote:

Update on this, we have deployed our identifying code to the pageview pipeline and it is being run on shadow mode (meaning end users do not yet see the results of the classification)

The flood fortunately stopped, but the most viewed articles of 2019 is strongly occupied by them (5., 7., 8., 10–16., etc.). Would be a disclaimer possible and useful until they are gone? @MusikAnimal

Thank you very much! I finally understand it. :D

In T210224#5710676, @Jdforrester-WMF wrote:

What's the status here? It seems like we've been over-running the "test" for seven months waiting for the analysis. Is that right?

No, it does not. But the deletion log can contain only delete and restore actions which still should not be on the watchlist.

Since 19th of October, the flood has stopped (17th and 18th of October).

Sorry about the suggestion part, I was not familiar with the gadget (because when I tried, I could not set it up with my account). I find generally this issue problematic. Your solutions are good because I know only one problematic editor. But what should we do if we have dozens? It is already a hard job to patrol alone a language completely, so I am sure about that I would not even try to do that if I have to deal with unstoppable non-vandal but incorrect edits too. I do not know what the others think, but I could imagine that it is already a problem with few languages.

T123442 could be related.

@Nuria Thanks for the details! Is there anything further we can do?

A list would truly be useful.

Thanks for the fast reply and sorry about the false alarm!

In T230392#5411138, @DannyS712 wrote:

What site is this on?

Are there any new information/update?

In T229346#5377045, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

@Bencemac I’m not a huwiki admin. How could I confirm it apart from looking at the special page you linked, which can be done by anyone?

Hungarian Wikipedia is done.

In T226446#5353827, @Charlotte wrote:

I might say "usually begin with a lowercase letter" - because in the example you show, it is correct to start with an uppercase character. Alas, the ambiguity is the whole reason we need the helper text, and can't just make an automagical solution.

In T228616#5353188, @Aklapper wrote:

@Bencemac: Which problem does this create?

Asking as you are already on wikidata, so this feels redundant (and might be an intentional feature).

@Charlotte For capitalisation, please see T226446.

I can confirm the problem with Firefox 67.0.2 and Edge 44.18362.1.0 on Windows 1903.

In T222616#5195324, @Niharika wrote:

@Bencemac If everything goes well, we will be rolling this out during the next week (May 20-24).

Hello! Can I ask a little status update? Thanks in advance!

More and more. I fear I could easily find more of them. @Lydia_Pintscher; shall we do an emergency shut down?