A list would truly be useful.

Thanks for the fast reply and sorry about the false alarm!

Hungarian Wikipedia

Are there any new information/update?

In T229346#5377045, @Tacsipacsi wrote:

@Bencemac I’m not a huwiki admin. How could I confirm it apart from looking at the special page you linked, which can be done by anyone?

Hungarian Wikipedia is done.

In T226446#5353827, @Charlotte wrote:

I might say "usually begin with a lowercase letter" - because in the example you show, it is correct to start with an uppercase character. Alas, the ambiguity is the whole reason we need the helper text, and can't just make an automagical solution.

In T228616#5353188, @Aklapper wrote:

@Bencemac: Which problem does this create?
Asking as you are already on wikidata, so this feels redundant (and might be an intentional feature).

@Charlotte For capitalisation, please see T226446.

I can confirm the problem with Firefox 67.0.2 and Edge 44.18362.1.0 on Windows 1903.

In T222616#5195324, @Niharika wrote:

@Bencemac If everything goes well, we will be rolling this out during the next week (May 20-24).

Hello! Can I ask a little status update? Thanks in advance!

More and more. I fear I could easily find more of them. @Lydia_Pintscher; shall we do an emergency shut down?

Cool, thank you!

One more example.

Thank you and sorry for the late idea!

@Tgr; I mark this as resolved because T171992 has all of these abilities and features, so in my honest opinion, there is nothing more to do.

@MusikAnimal; Thanks for your work! I forgot to mention Global sysops who can create similar logs as stewards. For example, see Billinghurst's activity at urwiki. Could you implement this user group as well?

Ping @Edoderoo

In T210224#5020974, @Zache wrote:

My suggestion is that because it is almost April the testing period would be a full year (365 days) if it is not a problem for huwiki community and then revert the change. This would make the results of the test more useful to others. This, of course, requires support from huwiki community.

In T210224#5020761, @Mahveotm wrote:

I will work on this but expect comments from Hungarian Wikipedia community members before this is deployed.

We could use my talk page as a test.

@Cyberpower678 Thank you!

Raised the priority because this case is pending since October 2018.

Note: I finished the translation (98%).

Because we voted for a test period/temporary time, not for default (currently this is the default setting).

I re-open it instead of creating a new ticket. I hope it is not a problem.

In T210224#4792557, @Aklapper wrote:

In T210224#4792481, @Bencemac wrote:

@Dereckson, who did it?

Who did what?

See below.

In T121995#4116887, @Stashbot wrote:

Mentioned in SAL (#wikimedia-operations) [2018-04-09T14:28:12Z] <dereckson@tin> Synchronized wmf-config/flaggedrevs.php: Always show latest revision even if not reviewed on hu.wikipedia (T121995) (duration: 00m 59s)

In T210224#4792005, @Aklapper wrote:

@Bencemac: If I interpret T210224#4771188 correctly: When you or someone else provides a configuration change patch.

@Cyberpower678:

• diff1
• diff2

One more week has passed. When can we expect any action?

In T210275#4791574, @Cyberpower678 wrote:

Unfortunately, this can't be acted on as the data is now in IABot. Please re-report if it happens again, and leave untouched so it ca be investigated.

@Aklapper All I can say is that the majority (who participated in the discussion) still want the reverting.

@Aklapper I do not agree. We discussed that we cannot answer the test's main question (like 'do we loose anons and new [non-trusted] editors because their changes do not appear immediately?') because we did not collect data for this (or for anything else, not at all). As a speaker, I am only repeating myself.

@Cyberpower678 Can we say that this is resolved by IABot and close it?

Asked the community to decide; should we revert it or is it the stable setting now?

@Dereckson The test period has ended, what's now?

I am a little bit disappointed because if I see right, TemplateWizard is much better and has more functions than VE's one.

TemplateWizard is enabled for me everywhere (Hungarian/English Wikipedia, Meta) but I cannot find anywhere the new icon, only VE's old one. Any idea about that what I am doing wrong? I have always wanted to test it.

@Cyberpower678 A gentle reminder. Could you give us a little update?

@Aklapper Per reports of the affected users, the problem has been resolved this week, which means somebody fixed it (by accident?).

@MusikAnimal Furthermore, links on Automated Edits are broken/wrong as well. For example, two links of three tools (undo and redirect) are broken on my stats (pointing to non-existing pages). Maybe we should use Meta pages instead of trying to find the local ones?

In T186653#4631172, @Niharika wrote:

In T186653#4622937, @Bencemac wrote:

@Niharika Do you have plan for beta (e.g. which wikis will participate)?

@Bencemac The wizard is ready and I asked users on the project talk page if there's interest in being early adopters. I didn't get much of a response so I have created T205290: Convert TemplateWizard into a beta feature instead. It will go out on all wikis as a beta feature and then be eventually converted to a regular tool on all wikis. Does that seem like a good idea?

@Niharika Do you have plan for beta (e.g. which wikis will participate)?

In T205180#4613713, @Aklapper wrote:

Does the problem also happen when using safemode=1 on Special:Watchlist?
If it does, please provide any non-default settings on https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciális:Beállításaim#mw-prefsection-watchlist to reproduce.

In T205180#4607856, @Aklapper wrote:

Can Misibacsi please try again with safemode=1? This allows you to test if a problem is because of your user scripts or personal gadgets without uninstalling them. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Locating_broken_scripts for more information.

@Ascilto You can do it here (I did it myself).

Editing a section of a huge page and saving the changes are very slow as well; you can try it on these pages.

Templates were fixed today, we are waiting for v2.0beta10.

In T197541#4564828, @Catrope wrote:

because NULL != 90 is false (that sounds strange, but any comparison involving null is false).

One more.

@alanajjar Please take a look.

@srishakatux Isn't this solved by DuplicateReferences gadget?

Yes, but these are because of our Labdarúgó-mérkőzés template, so IABot did not make any mistake. In summary, I cannot reproduce the problem either.

Sorry about that. Please watch this video. In my opinion, the software should format the second link (below text) like this
[[wikidata:User:Pasleim/Items for deletion/Page deleted]]

@Esanders Yes, it is correct. My problem is that simply inserting the link does not work like this. For example:

Not? In my opinion, internal links are nicer, shorter and indicate that better they are linking to a Wikimedia-related project (Wikidata, Commons, Phabricator, etc.)

Maybe these Wikidata items can help: AfD, RfD and RfPP.

I forgot to mention, but this was not the first time; I got likely and very likely before.

You are right, sorry for the false alarm. My bad.

Hmm, today IABot deleted them.