Page MenuHomePhabricator

Help readers remember the time they spend on Wikipedia
Open, MediumPublic

Description

This task proposes a new view that enables people to see, and potentially refer back to, the pages they visited during a specific "session." [i]

The core of this proposal is about enabling people who visit/read Wikipedia to more clearly see and remember the time they spend here and the impact that time has on them. E.g. Do you remember learning something new? Do you remember being inspired? Do you remember the moment where decided to go to your library’s website and borrow a book? etc.

Stories

As someone who regularly reads Wikipedia and finds themselves traveling down/through rabbit holes, I want to be able to more easily remember what I thought about/felt/did during these moments, so that I can more easily:

  1. Refer back to a page I visited and have since forgotten the name of
  2. Learn about and understand myself by seeing and making sense of the paths/lines of curiosities I've followed over time [ii]
  3. Discover opportunities for me to learn something new

Open Questions/Provocations

  • 1. When might people visit the page/place this task is suggesting we create?
    • When I am deciding what book to read next, I might visit this page, filter it by "articles about books," and see what articles I've read about books in the past ___ day(s)/month(s)/year(s) and see which – if any – resonate with me in that moment. [iii]
    • When I am planning a trip, I might visit this page, filter it by "articles about/related to physical place(s)" so that I can see whether there are any places I'd like to be sure to see [iv]
  • 2. How might this page provide to people who visit and use Wikipedia differently? E.g. People who visit Wikipedia intermittently (every few days/weeks/months). People who visit Wikipedia with specific learning objectives in mind (they are doing a research for a paper/report/etc.)?
  • 3. What new possibilities / opportunities could this page/place create? E.g. Might this be a place to read content related to what you'd previously explored, but had not yet discovered?
  • 4. What might people come to this page seeking to learn?
    • "What categories (read: topics) have I been reading the most pages within?"
    • "Of the biographies I've read, what percentage have been about women/men/etc.?"

Background

This idea is inspired, in part, by work the Wikipedia iOS app, Google Chrome (chrome://history/journeys), Apple Photos, Google Photos, etc. are doing to help people store/make memories within these tools/services

Wikipedia iOS appChrome's "Journeys" pageApple Photos
IMG_D87C1530D389-1.jpeg (2×1 px, 611 KB)
Screen Shot 2022-04-08 at 1.04.49 PM.png (1×1 px, 297 KB)
Screen Shot 2022-04-08 at 1.03.57 PM.png (1×1 px, 226 KB)
IMG_3155.jpg (2×1 px, 347 KB)

References


i. TBD what "session" would need to means in this particular context for people to perceive the pages they visit within each to stand out in their minds as a cogent memory
ii. A bit deep, I know! Tho, this is true of my experience and maybe others'?
iii. This use case was prompted by me reading en: The Social Construction of Reality, adding it to the reading list I maintain outside of Wikipedia (in Apple Notes), and thinking, "Huh, wouldn't it be nice if Wikipedia would remember this for me."
iv. This use case was prompted by reading about Kengo Kuma's work and thinking, "If I ever visit Japan, I'd like to visit a structure/environment/place Kuma designed."

Event Timeline

ppelberg updated the task description. (Show Details)
ppelberg updated the task description. (Show Details)

This seems a very relevant area to explore. There are many things people learn from Wikipedia but they have to figure out how to keep track of them.
It could be useful for Wikipedia to support more in helping build "your second brain" (keeping a personalized graph of connected knowledge) as popularized by some editing tools like Obsidian. Personally, I've been using the list feature of mobile Wikipedia apps to keep track of relevant topics.

I'd consider not to limit it to just articles as the minimal unit of knowledge. I think it could be quite powerful to highlight a specific excerpt or section from an article to keep it for future reference, check updates about it, share it, remix it, etc. Doing it for an article makes also a lot of sense, but considering other smaller or larger (categories?) granularity levels opens new possibilities.

ppelberg added a subscriber: alexhollender_WMF.

Note: I've created the ===Open Questions/Provocations section and populated it with the questions @alexhollender_WMF shared with me when we talked about this offline on 11 April 2022.

I'd consider not to limit it to just articles as the minimal unit of knowledge. I think it could be quite powerful to highlight a specific excerpt or section from an article to keep it for future reference, check updates about it, share it, remix it, etc. Doing it for an article makes also a lot of sense, but considering other smaller or larger (categories?) granularity levels opens new possibilities.

@Pginer-WMF, this notion of creating affordances that enable people to "pick up" atomic "units of knowledge" that resonate with them and "take it with them" so that they can make sense of it/engage more deeply with it later is interesting to me!

One of the reasons I think I find this interesting is because it's leading me to think, "Hmm, would it be compelling/make sense for us to think of activities like highlighting as contributions, actions that improve other peoples' experiences on the wiki?"

Here, I'm thinking about the potential for the page this task is describing to include highlights other people have made that are relevant to a rabbit hole/line of curiosity they've travelled down, but had not yet explored for themselves.

ppelberg updated the task description. (Show Details)
ppelberg added a subscriber: cmadeo.