@Urbanecm_WMF - I added this task in response to the topic you brought up earlier this week.
I realize this is a manual and imperfect solution, but perhaps good enough for now?
If this sounds good, we can simply take on a task like this once per quarter?

@KStoller-WMF: "Q1 2023" was Jaunary-March 2023, is that a typo?

In T341909#9017882, @Aklapper wrote:

@KStoller-WMF: "Q1 2023" was Jaunary-March 2023, is that a typo?

That should have read Q1 FY23-24, thanks for catching that!

In T341909#9016922, @KStoller-WMF wrote:

@Urbanecm_WMF - I added this task in response to the topic you brought up earlier this week.

Thanks!

I realize this is a manual and imperfect solution, but perhaps good enough for now?

Probably, yes.

If this sounds good, we can simply take on a task like this once per quarter?

I think the frequency can be even lower, per https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/newprojects@lists.wikimedia.org/latest and https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Incubator:Site_creation_log, there doesn't appear to be a lot of Wikipedias newly created in a quarter. From a technical perspective, deploying the features to handful of wikis at once is similarly difficult to deploying the feature to one wiki, so probably not necessary to do that often.

We can enable mentorship fairly easily, Suggested edits might be trickier. @Trizek-WMF @KStoller-WMF Any thoughts on which features to enable on those wikis in this round?

Hmmmm, I think we decided that it's worth enabling Mentorship, Help, and the Impact module even if we can't enable Suggested edits yet. @Trizek-WMF does that sound correct?

Is it possible to "enable" suggested edits with all of the tasks disabled (so communities can decide to enable in the future without engineering help)? Or does that create an empty / broken suggested edits module?

In T341909#9057423, @KStoller-WMF wrote:

Is it possible to "enable" suggested edits with all of the tasks disabled (so communities can decide to enable in the future without engineering help)? Or does that create an empty / broken suggested edits module?

As of now, that is not possible. We can fully disable Suggested edits from our end (it happened at fr.wiktionary), but that's in server config and need to be changed by an engineer. When no tasks are defined, the module looks like this (which is not very inviting):

There are two possible approaches we can go with:

1. we can add "are Suggested edits enabled" (defaulting to false) to Special:EditGrowthConfig and ask admins to set it to true once ready (T332824: Make wgSuggestedEditsEnabled modifiable via Special:EditGrowthConfig)
2. we can automatically enable Suggested edits once there are some suggestions available (T343221: Suggested edits: Disable Suggested edits when no suggestions are available)

I prefer the second approach (it removes the possibility of an admin [or us, when we deploy Add a link] forgetting setting the value to Enabled), but the first one is somewhat easier to implement. Also see related discussions in the two tasks above, plus T270300: Scale: deploy without SuggestedEdits (which is kind of an umbrella task for those two).

Do you have any opinions on which route to go with @KStoller-WMF?

These wikis have a minimum of content. We should define a threshold when Add an image and/or Add a link could work.

Mentorship is activated by the communities. If activated, then the homepage should be made available.
T343221: Suggested edits: Disable Suggested edits when no suggestions are available seems to be the best approach, as we would have the image module, the Help links module, and the Mentorship module.

How would we scale from this configuration, when the first tasks can become available?

I agree that T343221: Suggested edits: Disable Suggested edits when no suggestions are available sounds like a more ideal solution.

How would we scale from this configuration, when the first tasks can become available?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question, but my understanding is that newcomers on these smaller wikis would simply have suggested edits once more than N articles are available for Suggested edits. (I think N should likely be ~10 or higher, so suggested edits don't immediately disappear when one is completed).

@Trizek-WMF Do you think that would be problematic, since it would happen automatically without Growth posting an update for the Wiki admins?

In T341909#9060632, @KStoller-WMF wrote:

Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question, but my understanding is that newcomers on these smaller wikis would simply have suggested edits once more than N articles are available for Suggested edits. (I think N should likely be ~10 or higher, so suggested edits don't immediately disappear when one is completed).

I don't recall us having a feature that does it puspusfully. IMO, we should have a way to "buffer" suggestions, so that newcomers have at least a few suggested edits to choose and work on.

@Trizek-WMF Do you think that would be problematic, since it would happen automatically without Growth posting an update for the Wiki admins?

I think it is fine, as far as it is well documented.