Please give me a ping once the new pages are in place so that I can update the links from the WLM map:
https://github.com/fornpunkt/wlm-karta/pull/2

I know there was a wish from WMSE to be able to track from which map/tool an upload was initiated, is there an intent to add something like that to the campaign? Assuming it would be implemented by passing a category name as an URL parameter, it would be easily implemented on my end.

@Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE @Lokal_Profil it looks like the "rights" section of the campaigns are broken. Looks like all the customizations are gone(no third party content, simplified licenses, etc).

Sorry for not seeing the earlier messages.

In T372391#10075248, @Abbe98 wrote:

Please give me a ping once the new pages are in place so that I can update the links from the WLM map:
https://github.com/fornpunkt/wlm-karta/pull/2

Other than jury members the contents should be updated and I believe @Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE tagged it for translation.

In T372391#10075264, @Abbe98 wrote:

I know there was a wish from WMSE to be able to track from which map/tool an upload was initiated, is there an intent to add something like that to the campaign? Assuming it would be implemented by passing a category name as an URL parameter, it would be easily implemented on my end.

A tracking category such as Files uploaded using Fornpunkt passed via urlparam should be sufficient and would allow doing a category intersection later.

In T372391#10099512, @Abbe98 wrote:

@Alicia_Fagerving_WMSE @Lokal_Profil it looks like the "rights" section of the campaigns are broken. Looks like all the customizations are gone(no third party content, simplified licenses, etc).

Thanks for flagging this one. I didn't participate in WLE, can either of you confirmed this happened after that?

Looks like there were plenty of changes in the UploadWizard repo during the last months and T365560: [M] Don't show "this is for my personal use" question if user is uploading as part of a campaign at least seems to indicate that breaking the simple nature of Campaigns to then fix that later was considered OK during this process.

I didn't participate in WLE, can either of you confirmed this happened after that?

Looks like the main work on redoing the Own Work options were done back in November (at least that's when the AI question was added)

I'm not sure that's related given that it looks like all the licensing options listed in the documentation is broken/ignored: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:UploadWizard/Campaigns#licensing

In T372391#10101748, @Abbe98 wrote:

I'm not sure that's related given that it looks like all the licensing options listed in the documentation is broken/ignored: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:UploadWizard/Campaigns#licensing

What I see (for both wlm-se-bbr and wlm-se-fornmin) is:

The licensing choices CC-BY-SA-4.0, CC-BY and CC0 match the choices provided in the config (and are the same as since 2020). But it looks like the top one from the config is no longer pre-selected (if that was what you meant). Loosing the pre-selected default seems to have been an unfulfilled acceptance criteria of T347756: [L] Redesign choosing Creative Commons license for own work.

While "ownWorkDefault": "own", is stil respected insofar as hiding some of the options in the usual UploadWizard you are still presented with two other choices ("do you know what own work means" and "is it really educational") both of which interfere significantly with the intention of campaigns, i.e. being extremely streamlined upload paths for a pre-approved narrow category of content.

While "ownWorkDefault": "own", is stil respected insofar as hiding some of the options in the usual UploadWizard you are still presented with two other choices ("do you know what own work means" and "is it really educational") both of which interfere significantly with the intention of campaigns, i.e. being extremely streamlined upload paths for a pre-approved narrow category of content.

Ah I see, I wasn't aware that this new questions is in addition to the old options rather than a replacement.

For the third question we already got T365560, but for the first one we probably want a second task as it could be useful to have it toggle-able? (given that some campaigns allows third-party works)

Created T373575: Restore expected Campaign behaviour of first license choice being pre-seleced for the pre-selected license and T373577: Make the "Is this entirely your own work" question togglable through Campaign config for the "entirely own work" question.

Merged my duplicate into your T373576