Page MenuHomePhabricator

Changes on tabs for namespaces 100 and 101
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

Author: helios89

Description:
I need to link the tab for the namespace 100 to "MediaWiki:Nstab-portal" and
namespace 101 to "MediaWiki:Nstab-portaltalk".

I need that on it.wiki and sr.wiki


Version: unspecified
Severity: normal

Details

Reference
bz4278

Related Objects

Event Timeline

bzimport raised the priority of this task from to Medium.Nov 21 2014, 9:00 PM
bzimport set Reference to bz4278.
bzimport added a subscriber: Unknown Object (MLST).

You'll want MediaWiki:Nstab-portale, etc.

helios89 wrote:

Yes. I need that. And for the talk tabs?

helios89 wrote:

Ehm..and sorry for my bad english, i'm not a native speaker and i look a bit
rude. ;)

I suppose MediaWiki:Nstab-Discussioni_portale will do it.

I have commited a change, the tab now show the mediawiki: message name
instead of the default 'Article' .

That should let user guess how to fix the issue.

gangleri wrote:

Hallo!

Please see [[it:MediaWiki:Nstab-portale]] at
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/special:Prefixindex/Nstab?namespace=8
and
[[sr:MediaWiki:Nstab-Портал]] at
http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/special:Prefixindex/Nstab?namespace=8
to configure / create the tabs.

Adding "blocks"
Bug 4339: 'MediaWiki:Nstab-portal' missing in the Allmessages
which is marked as INVALID.

best regards reinhardt [[user:gangleri]]

gangleri wrote:

(In reply to comment #5)

I have commited a change, the tab now show the mediawiki: message name
instead of the default 'Article' .

That should let user guess how to fix the issue.

Please see
Bug 4852: For custom namespaces don't use MediaWiki:Nstab-foo use
MediaWiki:Nstab-nnnn

robchur wrote:

Will you *stop* adding blocks that aren't blocks and cross-referencing
willy-nilly? You've been asked several times. We've all got better things to do
than filter this crap out of our inboxes. Bugs to fix and features to fill in.

We're none of us stupid, or we wouldn't be developers. We can search for
relevant issues at the same time, or else, we appreciate it when *salient* links
are added using the "depends on" and "blocks" field.

I'm afraid this continous insertion of crap is counter-productive. I know the
intent is the reverse.