yes, i meant what we already have here @ifried

@MMoss_WMF @ifried that should be okay for the MVP. I agree that since we haven't built in controls for participants between 14-24 for the MVP yet, having that broader classification will allow for privacy protection and i am also not overly concerned about child safety because we have a vetted list of organizers for the MVP. We can discuss how to build in these controls for future versions later. I will still recommend (from our previous email thread) to have a reminder statement on the Friendly space policy since that still applies to all under 24 participants.

@ldelench_wmf - sharing my trust and safety inputs below :)

@ldelench_wmf - most of this looks good to me, thanks for addressing many of the concerns raised during the last review round :). I have shared feedback with some questions and recommendations on the clickwrap agreement T334761. I also have a few clarifying questions below on data aggregation

For answers to questions marked (PII) above: if and only if there are 10+ responses, responses will be pulled into an aggregate view. Organizers will NOT be able to view PII answers associated with usernames.