I've discussed the timeline with @SonjaPerry, and we have decided to stop the WE1.6 Task Prioritization key result at the end of April, rather than extend it a second time. We will plan to score the KR based on usage stats + any qualitative feedback we've received already.

Do you think we should spin up a separate hypothesis for this @KStoller-WMF ? Might be cleaner for measurement purposes than adding scope to WE1.8.4 / T415648

Double checking - are we deploying this experiment to English Wikipedia? It's crossed out in the task description, but I see English Wikipedia: 0.1 % in https://test-kitchen.wikimedia.org/experiment/growthexperiments-editattempt-anonwarning. Am I missing a piece?

Estimated 8 pts at Editing standup using following rubric (Peter may decide to adjust scope based on this estimate):

In T416038#11656385, @ppelberg wrote:

In T416038#11654967, @DLynch wrote:

@ppelberg in a sense -- it's the "discussiontoolspageinfo" row in this table:

What do you think about updating this task description with the content of T416038#11625576 and linking discussiontoolspageinfo to this ticket?

In T416038#11654973, @DLynch wrote:

With this change we might want to actually remove the "internal" flag from it.

I defer to you + the rest of the Editing Engineering Team to make this call.

Looks good to me, feel free to reopen if you notice anything awry