The wb_terms_language index on wb_terms is almost certainly not very useful (just ~400 distinct values over 600M+ rows), thus it can probably be dropped for good.
From db1087:
KEY `wb_terms_language` (`term_language`),
- dbstore2001.codfw.wmnet 3315
- db2089.codfw.wmnet 3315
- db2086.codfw.wmnet 3315
- db2085.codfw.wmnet 3315
- db2084.codfw.wmnet 3315
- db2083.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2082.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2081.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2080.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2079.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2075.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2038.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2045.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2052.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2059.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2066.codfw.wmnet 3306
- db2023.codfw.wmnet 3306
- labsdb1001.eqiad.wmnet 3306 (not possible, read-only host: T179464)
- labsdb1003.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- labsdb1009.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- labsdb1010.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- labsdb1011.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1095.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- dbstore1001.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- dbstore1002.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1070.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1071.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1082.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1109.eqiad.wmnet
- db1110.eqiad.wmnet
- db1087.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1092.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1096.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1099.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1100.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1104.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1106.eqiad.wmnet 3306
- db1063.eqiad.wmnet 3306