Page MenuHomePhabricator

Have ambassadors self evaluate their skills
Open, MediumPublic

Description

Something similar to what https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Capacity_Map is doing, but for individuals.

Event Timeline

Elitre triaged this task as Medium priority.May 10 2018, 3:49 PM

Which skills are common? Is there a baseline we should be adopting? Which people have unique abilities that wouldn't be represented?

Flagging this to @Trizek-WMF as one of the future phases of work.

Vvjjkkii renamed this task from Have ambassadors self evaluate their skills to 26caaaaaaa.Jul 1 2018, 1:10 AM
Vvjjkkii raised the priority of this task from Medium to High.
Vvjjkkii updated the task description. (Show Details)
Vvjjkkii removed a subscriber: Aklapper.
CommunityTechBot renamed this task from 26caaaaaaa to Have ambassadors self evaluate their skills.Jul 2 2018, 5:55 AM
CommunityTechBot lowered the priority of this task from High to Medium.
CommunityTechBot updated the task description. (Show Details)
CommunityTechBot added a subscriber: Aklapper.

I still haven't figured out the relation between this, T191399, and work @Trizek-WMF may need to do :)
Thoughts?

Let me ask, why do we need this? What is the goal or the benefit? I'm asking just to have this agreed and documented before proceeding with this task.

I would say that we could give Ambassadors a way to be recognized for their volunteer work. But we (as in Erica, Nick and me) to coordinate about that.

Let me ask, why do we need this? What is the goal or the benefit? I'm asking just to have this agreed and documented before proceeding with this task.

Because right now we're asking that people step up as ambassadors based on certain characteristics, but their individual skills and what they excel at isn't recognised. I think there's more to them than just being proficient in a certain language and being available to carry feedback back and from their home wikis. I think being able to identify who is capable of doing what (à la https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:VisualEditor/Community_Taskforce ) will be the key to the group growth and to their affirmation as experts in certain areas.

The real issue here is that the "sign up yourself" model is just. not. working. That's the obstacle we need to remove, if you ask me.

@Trizek-WMF this is clearly one of the next phases of the work for Ambassadors, in order for this group of people to become autonomous and self-sustained. I believe that we had already discussed that touching base with Asaf re: potential next communities to target, and now you could add as a topic the intersection between our program and what he's trying to do leveraging the tech skills of certain communities.

Tagging open CommRel-Documentation tasks with MoveComms-Support as Community-Relations does not exist anymore per https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/project/profile/3448/ . Feel free to set the task status to declined or invalid if this task is not valid anymore and/or if the team moved from public Phabricator to internal WMF tools to plan or manage its work.