| Izno | |
| Sep 23 2020, 9:30 PM |
| F34607043: image.png | |
| Aug 19 2021, 6:54 PM |
| F34607039: image.png | |
| Aug 19 2021, 6:54 PM |
| F34607036: image.png | |
| Aug 19 2021, 6:54 PM |
| F34607046: image.png | |
| Aug 19 2021, 6:54 PM |
I didn't see another tag, but when CodeMirror (I think it's CodeMirror that provides highlighting in the 2010/2017 wikitext editors?) hits a TemplateStyles tag it gives up and stops processing the rest of the page when there are also parameters on the page (but some of the page highlighting is fine in some cases; see TQI template).
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Izno/Sandbox&oldid=980018629
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Talk_quote_inline&oldid=859108285
Based on the cite extension model for highlighting, I think the correct place to make a fix is in TemplateStyles?
I doubt so. CodeMirror should be able to handle extension tags. Maybe it doesn't correctly parse self-closing tags?
It's not that it can't, it's that it's not responsible for the definition of the extension tags, I don't think (it could be that it doesn't handle self-closing extension tags; it has no issue with <br/> of course). /resources/mode/mediawiki/mediawiki.js doesn't have poem or ref defined... and in fact I have no idea where those are defined.
Extension tags are basically just XML syntax, and their names are available via MediaWiki configuration. CodeMirror shouldn't require custom setup to recognize them, only to highlight their contents in some specific way (but TemplateStyles tags have no content).
I narrowed this down: This occurs when there is a slash / in the src attribute of the templatestyles tag and doesn't seem to otherwise.
A combination of that and not having a space between the attribute and the closing />. And it only happens with <templatestyles>, not e.g. <cite src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"/>. Weird - there's nothing TemplateStyles-specific in CodeMirror, or CodeMirror-specific in TemplateStyles.
I can't reproduce this anymore in the same way that I think I could in the original report (should have got a screenshot /sigh).
There does still seem to be an issue: certain HTML tags won't display as expected. In the two links from the description. I think it may just be that <q> is not recognized by the syntax highlighter? <p> and <div> both highlight, though suboptimally:
